- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- Singh Not Wearing Stanford At Tournament
- Companies Behind Murray Have a Lot To Gain
- Hall Of Fame Suit Lists Revealing Numbers
- Sports Poker Event Trying To Buck Recession
- Billy Mays — He Left the World Knowing He Sold It
- NBA Draft: By The Numbers
- Vijay Singh Offers To Pay Stanford's Bail
- Is "The Big Pierogi" Next For Shaq?
- Singh Will Continue To Stick By Stanford
RSS FEED
SPORTS BIZ VIDEO GALLERY
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- 'We're in the Middle of a Crash': Black Swan
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Cuddle Parties Heat Up
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- The Worst Expected 2010 State Budget Gaps
- Fireworks At Pharma's Market
- Value of Warren Buffett's Annual Gift to Gates Foundation Falls Along With Berkshire's Stock
- Michael Jackson: The Music And The Money
- Five Stock Picks for This Market
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- Weak Dollar Means Gold at $1,040: Strategist
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Top Videos: From the Black Swan to the Bond King

- Obama Plan Would Trim Back Financial Powerhouses
- Biden: 'We Misread How Bad The Economy Was'
- FedEx Sees Signs of a Turnaround: Report
- Property Tax Appeals Take Toll on Governments
- Chrysler Names Remaining Directors to New Board
- Car Dealer Determined To Fight Chrysler Over Franchise
- 'Ice Age' Heats Up Worldwide Box Office

![]() |
Why? Well, I liked Nike's [NKE
Loading...
()
] commercial a little bit better and I thought that Under Armour's [UARM
Loading...
()
] decision to run their spot during the Super Bowl was the wrong one.
I also liked the fact that Nike had the SPARQ license and a training program to tie itself to, a month and a half head start and a shoe that came in $10 cheaper than its competitor. Well, we're a month into Nike's rollout and I've now officially changed my mind. Yesterday, I received a note from Matt Powell of SportsOneSource, who is usually singing Nike's praises.
Powell in his March note wrote:
"The Nike Sparq performance trainer launch could only be termed as 'disappointing so far. Nike performing training sales actually declined for March. One theory is that kids will not be forced into wearing a sport specific shoe right now. Also, the timing may have been wrong for sport specific training footwear, with March being in the middle of spring sports season. Finally, a recession is probably the wrong time to ask Mom and Dad to buy a second shoe. We don't believe the disappointing SPARQ results will bode ill for the Under Armour release. There are surely a million kids in America who are so committed to UA that they will buy the Prototype Shoe. It is important to remember that the Prototype is the first UA shoe kids can wear to school." 
One massive piece of the puzzle that Powell didn't include? A big player called Dick's Sporting Goods [DKS
Loading...
()
] .
A couple months ago, I got a phone call from one of the people I routinely talk to. He told me that Dick's didn't buy a single Nike SPARQ shoe and bought big time into Under Armour's prototypes.
Correction: I later found out that Dick's did purchase SPARQ shoes, though in very limited quantities.
People read Dick's as Under Armour guys, but they sell tons of Nike stuff too. They are strongly committed to Nike Plus running and have the Livestrong and ACG exclusive. What I'm saying is these guys came in with no bias and they decided that Under Armour was the going to be the winner in this battle and by virtue of that decision that just might be who wins this game in the end. Now let's sit back and watch. The UA trainers hit the market on May 3.
In other SPARQ news, the University of Florida asked Nike to take down all references to quarterback Tim Tebow on its SPARQ website yesterday.
Questions? Comments?












