- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
More Videos
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Existing-Home Sales Jump To Highest Level in 2-1/2 Years
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- Start-Up Proves Everything Really Is Better With Bacon
- TV Retailer QVC Joins 'Black Friday' Frenzy
- Buffett's Wealth and Fame Hasn't Helped 'Warren' As a Name
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
- China Asks Its Banks to Slow Down
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Rally Could 'Have Some Legs in 2010': Market Strategist
- Investors May Skew Housing Reality
- Buffett's Wealth and Fame Hasn't Helped 'Warren' As a Name
- Are Crazy Retail Deals Good for Business?
- Expect a 'Square Root-Shaped' Recovery: Chief Investor
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
- HP to Feed on Enterprise Spending Next Year: Tech Analyst
- Bear, Lehman Execs Weren't Wiped Out by Crisis: Study
- How Real Estate Investors Skew Housing's Reality
- Treasury Auction of $44 Billion Gets Good Response
- Even Buffett's Huge Fame Can't Help the Name 'Warren'
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
- Maria Blog: Are Crazy Retail Deals Good for Business?
- Suze Orman’s 'A Healthier, Wealthier You'
- Latest Holiday Drinks: The Madoff...and the TARPatini
Media Money
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
] and CBS [CBS
Loading...
()
] into two separate companies (he's chairman of both), they've become increasingly competitive. And just this Sunday, Viacom's Paramount Pictures studio said it's no longer going to distribute movies to CBS' Showtime. The deal started in 2002, and UBS analyst Michael Morris tells me brought Paramount an estimated $100 million in annual revenue. Now Paramount is teaming up with MGM [MGM
Loading...
()
] and Lionsgate , who currently also supply movies to Showtime, to create a new premium cable channel and video-on-demand service beginning in fall 2009.
This speaks to how incredibly important these deals selling movie rights to pay TV are to studio produts. It also says a lot about how much the studios, in this more challenging environment, want to cut out the middle man--in this case Showtime--whenever possible. Viacom CEO Philipe Dauman said that the new channel will give more flexiblity.
One key issue here is digital distribution. Iff Paramount remains in control, not Showtime, Paramount may choose to offer movies on iTunes at the same time as it airs it on TV and perhaps timing digital distribution sooner than Showtime would have allowed in its previous relationship.
And cable channels are doing quite well for the media giants. Just look at the huge growth of Disney's [DIS
Loading...
()
]ESPN and Disney Channel. WIth viewership shifting away from the networks and towards cable, this could be a wise investment. Plus, Viacom already has infrastructure in place, having plenty experience with cable networks with MTV and its other properties.
So what does this mean for Showtime? Losing Paramount, MGM and Lionsgate can't be good, especially because all the other major studios (Disney, Warner Bros., and Universal) are committed to other pay-TV distribution deals through HBO and Starz. Showtime's CEO said they're not concerned, and that those very suppliers who are leaving them have given them enough movies to last until 2011.
So Viacom is now creating its own version of CBS' Showtime, CBS has created its own movie studio, a mini Paramount of sorts. And CEO of Paramount, Brad Grey, is rebuilding Paramount's TV production business to better compete with CBS' TV productions and others.
It certainly seems to me like both companies are trying to recreate what they lost when they split off from the other half of the company. Which raises the question: why bother splitting up the old Viacom into two companies, if it's only going to result in two companies that are just as broad and varied as the original one? Redstone has said he wants CBS and Viacom to function truely independently, and they certainly are.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes