- Risk Aversion is Back -- Big Problem is Oil
- Citi Conference Call: Happy Antidote to AIG
- AIG, Oil Drag on Asia, Europe Markets & U.S. Futures
- Long And Short Of It: Platinum ETNs On Their Way
- Retail Sales: The Good, Bad And Bottom Line
- For Markets, Question Is Whether Oil Trumps Better Sales
- Dollar And Oil: Stop This Game Right Now
- For Markets, Biggest Problem Of All Is Oil
- What Does The Market Need? More Demand
- Tech, Financials Give Market A Lift But Volume Still A Concern
- Market 360: The Best and Worst of the Week for US Equities, Commodities, Currencies, and More
- Your First Move For Monday May 12th

- Web Extra: 3 Trades For Week Ahead

- Surprise Friday: Guess The Guest!

- Lightning Round OT: Fluor, Aqua America and More

- Cramer: AIG Chief Must Go
- The Fast Money Misfires – Friday May 9th

- Pops & Drops: Sprint, Tesoro...

- How Cramer Missed a Double
- Build-A-Trade

- Middle East Violence Holds Oil Above $126
- Asian Markets Are Mixed, Oil Continues Hot Streak
- Citi May Sell Japan Consumer Unit: Report
- China Forms New Company to Make Jumbo Jets
- 'Iron Man' Pounds Box-Office Competition
- BT May Sell Data Centers to H-P: Report
- Does a Weak Dollar Equal High Prices at the Pump?
- Market 360: The Best and Worst of the Week for US Equities, Commodities, Currencies, and More
- FedEx Cuts Profit Outlook, Citing Higher Fuel Costs
- Stocks Close Lower on Record Oil, AIG Loss

This story about rice shortages -- which we covered yesterday and has today reached the "general" media -- is a good example of how the public can misunderstand an event.
There are two things going on here:
1) stories about food commodity prices rising over the past few months has attracted speculative investment, and
2) a few stories in the popular press about the increasing price of foodstuffs has caused a small percentage of the population to act, by buying much larger quantities of certain foodstuffs than they normally would. A small percentage (my guess is maybe 3-5 percent of the households) may actually be "hoarding," that is, buying far larger quantities of food than they could consume in several weeks.
But is there a physical shortage of rice? The answer seems to be no; but if that is so, why is CostCo [COST
Loading...
(%)
] limiting sales?
Trade with CNBC's Experts |
The answer lies in how a modern economy works: just-in-time inventory has become the standard. Under this methodology, stores do not stock large supplies of food, clothing, or anything else; they rely on computer models to accurately predict supply and demand. They rely on a supply chain that replenishes the products on a daily basis.
According to NewScientist:
1) a typical city has a 3-day supply of food;
2) a typical hospital has a 2-day supply of oxygen
Sound shocking? It hasn't bothered anyone, and it works fine, as long as something strange -- like hoarding -- doesn't occur.
Because when hoarding occurs, when even, say, 10 percent of your customers suddenly buy 10 times the amount of a single product than they normally would buy, the product is quickly exhausted and the supply chain will have trouble immediately providing the product.
So there is not a physical shortage of rice; there is a problem with the supply chain because hoarding has stressed the system.
Of course, if everyone decided to start hoarding, there would be a problem with the actual supply of rice. My point is that this story happened for a different reason.
Don't get me wrong -- there are long-term factors increasing demand for protein-based foods, and the grains that are used to feed the livestock.
Potash this morning included a long essay in its earnings report, noting that people in developing countries where populations are increasing "require more food and can afford a more nutritious diet that includes protein from meat sources. This requires an ever-increasing number of animals for food production and millions of additional tonnes of feed grains."
But that long-term issue is a far cry from the so-called shortage of rice we are seeing.
related content |
Questions? Comments?



