More Videos
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- Singh Not Wearing Stanford At Tournament
- Companies Behind Murray Have a Lot To Gain
- Hall Of Fame Suit Lists Revealing Numbers
- Sports Poker Event Trying To Buck Recession
- Billy Mays — He Left the World Knowing He Sold It
- NBA Draft: By The Numbers
- Vijay Singh Offers To Pay Stanford's Bail
- Is "The Big Pierogi" Next For Shaq?
- Singh Will Continue To Stick By Stanford
RSS FEED
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- 'We're in the Middle of a Crash': Black Swan
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- Cuddle Parties Heat Up
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Your First Move For Monday July 6th
- Malaysia PM Speaks to CNBC
- NY City Apartment Sales Down More Than 50%
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- Fireworks At Pharma's Market
- Value of Warren Buffett's Annual Gift to Gates Foundation Falls Along With Berkshire's Stock
- Michael Jackson: The Music And The Money
- Five Stock Picks for This Market
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- Weak Dollar Means Gold at $1,040: Strategist
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- For Banks, Wads of Cash and Loads of Trouble
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- For Australian Winemakers, More Turns Out to Be Less
- Earnings Season: A Likely Game-Changer
- Slideshow: Best-Selling Fourth of July Fireworks
- Divisions Dominate as Third Quarter Begins
- Stanford Clients Sue Insurance Broker Willis Group
Text Size 
 |
Flikr/infowidget Progressive Field |
Sports Illustrated obviously realizes this so I’m sure they are happy with the results of their new ballpark rankings like this:
1. Cleveland Indians – Progressive Field
2. Milwaukee Brewers – Miller Park
3. Pittsburgh Pirates – PNC Park
The SI guys allowed fans to rank all 30 MLB ballparks based on these criteria: affordability, food, team quality, tradition, atmosphere, fan IQ, hospitality, promotions, traffic and neighborhood.
That’s how they came up with those three teams at the top, while classics like Wrigley Field (15th) Yankee Stadium (ranked 20th) Fenway Park (ranked 21st) Dodger Stadium (ranked 22nd) weren’t even close.
But, as Team Marketing’s Jon Greenberg also points out, if Progressive Field was so good, how come the Indians are 23rd in the league in attendance while four teams whose stadiums are ranked in the bottom third are in the top 10 in attendance?
Two answers I can think of here. Either the people who show up are very happy and the people that don't just don't realize how good it is. Or--and what I think the main issue really is--the 10 categories simply can't be weighed equally, as they did.
Let's get this out of the way. Hospitality is an idiotic category. How the opposing fans are treated? Who cares? FanIQ doesn't belong in a ballpark ranking, either. Instead, they should have had a ticket availability category. In other words, how easy is it to get tickets? That's much more important to a ballpark than the people that are in it and it's easier to quantify too.
As far as the weighing goes, there's no way that team quality can be weighed the same as food and promotions. Team quality is the number one factor as to whether you go to the game or not. Food is an important part of the experience, but anyone who has been to a lot of parks knows that there's not a big swing in food as there once was.
Every one has caught up to the game with all the new stadiums being built. Most teams don't have good promotions anyway, so it's a shame that the Red Sox get hacked for not having good promotions when they have no reason to have any in the first place.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes