Tech Check
MOST SHARED
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- 'Mortgage Deal from Hell' Hurts Responsible Borrowers: Bove
- FBI Investigated Steve Jobs Drug Use
- Mortgage Plan Gives Homeowners Bulk of the Benefits
- Rise of the Solo Economy
- More States Looking to Tax Online Sales
- Rough Seas Ahead in the South Pacific
- Can Anybody Be an Entrepreneur?
- Top Fashion Stocks for 2012
- How to Date a Wall Street Man
- Robo-Deal Is All About Lowering Mortgage Principal
- Groupon Needs More Disclosure: Analyst
- CEO to CEO: Taking a Job at a Startup vs. a Public Company
- Farr: Money, Jobs and Politics — We're Still in a State of Risk
- PepsiCo CEO: We’re Not Splitting the Company
- Can Ford Make a Smooth Transition in Management?
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- China’s Steelmakers Set for Turnaround: Analyst
- Bulls Bet Silicon Motion Will Bounce
- 'Mortgage Deal from Hell' Hurts Sound Borrowers: Bove
- Fidelity: 401(k) Balances Little Changed Over 2011
- Greek Political Leaders Agree On Austerity Reforms
- Robo-Deal Is All About Lowering Mortgage Principal
- Fed Fines Banks $766 Million Over Mortgage Practices
- Options Trader Scores Big on Diamond Foods Selloff
- 12 Unique Dating Sites
- Zuckerberg Takes Control, You Get $100
- Ban on Insider Trading by Congress Passes House
RSS FEED
Yahoo Disputes Microsoft's Non-Negotiation Claims
Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
A source close to Yahoo disputes Microsoft's claims that the internet search company was aloof in its negotiations following Microsoft's unsolicitied bid, and says Microsoft's own timeline shows an active negotiation process, whether Microsoft liked it or not.
![]() |
After CNBC posted a timeline provided by a source close to Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
], a source at Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] vehemently disagreed with the characterizations, and on one point in particular: that Microsoft claimed there was no reaction of any kind following the company's Friday decision to raise its bid to $33 from the original $31, something particularly troubling to the world's largest software maker.
Instead, this source said there was never a "formal offer" of $33, just a suggestion that Microsoft would be willing to come up "a couple of bucks" on the offer. Nothing, he says, was every put in writing. When Yahoo bankers wanted more details, even a written offer, details
on whether the new offer would be all-cash, or cash and stock, or a collared offer of some kind to reduce the downside if Microsoft shares lost value, it was Microsoft that refused to respond.
"That they were 'dumbfounded ...' It doesn't make any sense," this source said. "They were incredibly and purposely vague."
But the biggest dispute comes from the allegation that Yahoo refused to engage in any active negotiations. This source said the negotiations had always been robust. "It is simply factually incorrect to make it seem as though we weren't actively engaged in robust negotiations," he says.
He says Microsoft started with a $31 offer. Yahoo came back with $40. Microsoft held firm at $31. Yahoo came back at $38. Microsoft held firm. Yahoo came back at $37. Microsoft came up to $33. And when Yahoo wouldn't budge from $37, after already negotiating the price down, Microsoft ultimately walked away.
"It wasn't because we weren't curious, they weren't engaging," this source said. "Were we unengaged, or asking for too much money?" It can't be both, he says. "Microsoft is lying. How much communication do they want? They were upset because we wouldn't accept a low-ball bid."
I asked this source about whether the company was concerned about exposure in connection with fiduciary responsibility by letting the offer go away. He says emphatically that Yahoo is precisely embracing its fiduciary responsibility: "We felt Microsoft undervalued us; our fiduciary responsibility is to maximize shareholder value."
He points to Yahoo's recent earnings report as coming in at the high end of the expected range, with a strong outlook and a roadmap to future growth as the key indicators for Yahoo's value. He called Microsoft's bid "opportunistic," and says the company didn't walk from the deal because it was frustrated by the negotiation process, but rather because Microsoft knew there would be no way Yahoo's key institutional shareholders would back the Microsoft bid.
Microsoft could have taken the process hostile, he says, but the company knew there was no way for it to win. "If Microsoft thought that our shareholders wanted this number, then they would've launched a proxy fight," he says.
Questions? Comments?










