- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Dykstra Discusses Bankruptcy
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED

Talk about a nerve-wracking couple of days for Yahoo investors, especially the ones who flooded into the issue on Friday on word that Microsoft was increasing its offer to $33 a share.
Yahoo [MSFT
Loading...
()
] shares jumped 10 percent on that news, even though over and over again, we mentioned on the air as this news was breaking that despite an offer increase, there was still a chasm between Microsoft's bid and Yahoo's ask of $37.
Of course, now we know that Microsoft [YHOO
Loading...
()
] is abandoning its bid, and the speculation is all over the Street as to just how low Yahoo shares will plunge on the news.
I spoke to a source very close to the highest echelons of Yahoo's executive team who worried these shares could touch $15 or $17 this morning. Citigroup's Mark Mahaney is out with a note today suggesting they'll close the day down to only $26. Other sources say look for a steep decline to $20 or so before a late day recovery.
Across the pond in Frankfurt, the stock fell 20 percent to 14.55 euros ($22.50) in midday trading.
Either way, no matter where they go, they won't touch $33, and they certainly won't go anywhere near Yahoo's own self-valuation of $37, and that's really all that matters. Microsoft upped the ante to a 70 percent premium and Yahoo sources told me Sunday, in no uncertain terms that the offer was "low ball" and "opportunistic" with Microsoft taking advantage of a steep slide that took place in a very narrow period of time.
I don't buy it.
The steep slide has been going on for the better part of three years. If Microsoft wanted to be truly "opportunistic," the premium it offered would be substantially below 70 percent. And yet Yahoo's board voted unanimously against such a deal.
I haven't talked to a single Wall Street analyst who covers either company who isn't stunned that this deal fell apart. And many of you seem to agree: Mary Ellen writes in that "Microsoft and Yahoo both screwed the Yahoo shareholders. Microsoft probably rethought the acquisition after the market indicated a lack of enthusiasm for it ... Anybody who shorted Yahoo is going to make a ton of money. Those of us who own the stock are going to get creamed."
![]() |
Thanks for the kind words, Roester!
Also Roester, Jerry Yang has posted his own blog about this (http://ycorpblog.com/2008/05/04/ok-so-now-what/) which I encourage all of you to read.
His bottom line: "We've emerged a stronger, more focused company with an even greater sense of purpose. I'm so proud of how this company has come together, put the noise aside, and showed the world that we have the resolve and determination to thrive in challenging times."
More telling to me: "I'm sure you've all read or watched the news about this. Frankly, there's a lot of nonsense and misinformation in what's being reported. Just so we are clear, here's what happened. The board takes its mission very seriously. We clearly indicated to Microsoft that we were open to a transaction but only if it were on terms that fully recognized the value of Yahoo and was in the best interests of our stockholders. No one is celebrating about the outcome of these past three months. And no one should..."
Mark Rowell writes that, "I hope the shareholders drag Yang's a*s to court."
S.D. says, "You are spot on. It is strange to see co-founders and board collide like this. Angrily never intended to accept a bid, and acted rude to Microsoft. Founders in management is like death when going public. They never try to enhance shareholder values by selling/spinning off ...The last years have been poor and they are losing this battle. By saying good-bye to Microsoft, YangFil must fight Google alone. Say hello to $20 again."
Just a sample. I'll be following this through the day. I'm keen on your thoughts: Did Yahoo blow it? Did Microsoft? I'll print some of your responses. Should be a roller-coaster day for those of you with positions in each of these companies.







