More Videos
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
- Giving Palm Credit Where Credit is Due...To a Point
- Is It Time For Google To Worry?
- Jobs' Doctor Speaks
- Palm: Opportunity Or Irrational Exuberance?
- Jobs and Hospital Answer the Critics
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- 'We're in the Middle of a Crash': Black Swan
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- Malaysia PM Speaks to CNBC
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Cuddle Parties Heat Up
- Your First Move For Monday July 6th
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Fireworks At Pharma's Market
- Value of Warren Buffett's Annual Gift to Gates Foundation Falls Along With Berkshire's Stock
- Michael Jackson: The Music And The Money
- Five Stock Picks for This Market
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- Weak Dollar Means Gold at $1,040: Strategist
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- BOJ Shirakawa: Japan Corporate Finance Still Tight
- China Reassures on Dollar Debate Before G8
- Obama Heads to Moscow for 'Reset' Summit
- Alcoa to Post Loss — What Does This Mean?
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Partner Re to Buy Paris Re in $2 Billion Deal
- Obama Plan Would Trim Back Financial Powerhouses
- Biden: 'We Misread How Bad The Economy Was'
- FedEx Sees Signs of a Turnaround: Report
RSS FEED
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
They will do something. It's just that whatever it is likely won't be "together," even though Piper Jaffray is putting a 30 percent chance that these two will come back to the bargaining table to resume talks. I'm not sure that's in the cards.
Instead, it's probably time to broaden the cast of players and talk about what Microsoft can do.
Seems clear that the company will have to do something, seeing as its online business saw a nice jump in revenue for its Online Services Business, but at the same time, the unit racked up another $220 million in red ink. That's ugly, but uglier still when you consider Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] has been fumbling about trying to figure out a way to make money online for the better part of a decade.
Microsoft's acquisition of Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] was as much about Internet advertising as it was about software distribution. A half-billion users globally is the kind of audience worth everything Microsoft was offering, especially if it could reach that audience as potential Microsoft software and hardware customers.
It gets even more important when you grasp the concept of so-called "Cloud Computing," one of the key buzzwords in the business nowadays. Software hosted on Web sites instead of loaded onto your PC. Software downloaded from Web sites instead of purchased in a store. It's a concept put forth by salesforce.com [CRM
Loading...
()
] with a high degree of success. It's a concept embraced and espoused by Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] . It's something Time Warner [TWX
Loading...
()
] has talked about. Something important to Oracle [ORCL
Loading...
()
]. Microsoft needs a strategy here. Yahoo was almost like picking the low fruit.
But now Microsoft will be forced to get a little more creative. Could a Microsoft play for salesforce be in the cards? There had been a lot of discussion that salesforce would be a compelling deal for Google as the search giant seeks to do for corporate clients what it's already doing for consumers. Microsoft could use the algorithms and do much the same thing across enterprise and consumer customers.
And what about News Corp.? Seems Microsoft cozied up to Rupert Murdoch during the Yahoo negotiations; speculation is that News Corp. [NWS
Loading...
()
] isn't interested in Yahoo, or can't come up with enough cash on its own to offer a competing bid to what Microsoft already put forth.
So maybe News Corp. and Microsoft re-think their partnership and work together not just to take on Google, but Yahoo as well. MySpace doesn't seem to be the property it once was, when you see what other social networking sites like Facebook have become. But Yahoo today certainly isn't the property it once was either. And Microsoft already owns a small chunk of Facebook. Maybe it partners with News Corp. in some new, creative alliance that could be far cheaper than buying Yahoo, but could be far more effective at taking on Google?
More voices to the debate today:
JChang is ready to give Yahoo two years to get its shares up to the $37 that Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang thinks his company is worth. And if it doesn't happen, "then he should buy all the stock holders out at $37." My question: Why give Yahoo two years when you had a deal just a little below that right now, on the table, from Microsoft? Why wait?
Trientimp takes issue with Mary Ellen's quote in the last post: "She had a 50 percent premium when the stock ran up -- failed to sell it and now says 'Microsoft and Yahoo both screwed the Yahoo shareholders.' Greed -- it's the American weakness...unbelievable logic."
Pat wants to know, "How is it possible that the future of a giant public co. be decided by only two company officers?" And, "It's not fair that it only took two idiots to have the final say whether to accept the offer or not. Don't the millions of share holders have voting rights?" Well, actually, it was the entire board, but still!
Sinardy Xing suggests that "Yahoo should outsource the entire management team to Google, not only the Search department. Will Jerry (Yang) end up like Craig Conway from PeopleSoft?"
Also, to Yahoo's credit, the comments posted to Jerry Yang's blog this morning included some stinging criticism of Yang and the company's board. And Yahoo is posting all of them. Some do support the company, but by and large, the rebukes are biting. And certainly worth a read.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes