More Videos
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
- AMD's Ruiz Gets Tripped by Idle Chit-Chat
- Amazon is to eBay What Google is to Yahoo
- Tommy Lee, Medical Tourism and Nasty Santa, Your Emails
- U.S. Markets Gain 3% for the Week Despite 10.2% Unemployment
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Rockwell Automation Earnings: What Options Are Saying
- Gold Will Touch Higher Lows and Higher Highs: Analyst
- Is Misery Alive And Well in Your Office?
- Consumers Haven't Changed, They Are Just Pickier
- Watch Foreclosures, Seriously
- For the Jobless, 10% is Harder Than Before
- Week Ahead: Stocks Search for Catalyst in Quiet Week
- Outlook: Dollar Likely to Ride Higher on Bleak Jobs Report
- Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Says Net Income Tripled
- Cramer: Earnings, IPOs Dominate Next Week
- Buying Fear: How to Own Volatility
- Administration Rejects Plan to Buy Fannie Mae Credits
- Consumers Haven't Changed —They Just Got Pickier
- Want the Homebuyer's Tax Credit? Here Are Some Tips
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
They will do something. It's just that whatever it is likely won't be "together," even though Piper Jaffray is putting a 30 percent chance that these two will come back to the bargaining table to resume talks. I'm not sure that's in the cards.
Instead, it's probably time to broaden the cast of players and talk about what Microsoft can do.
Seems clear that the company will have to do something, seeing as its online business saw a nice jump in revenue for its Online Services Business, but at the same time, the unit racked up another $220 million in red ink. That's ugly, but uglier still when you consider Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] has been fumbling about trying to figure out a way to make money online for the better part of a decade.
Microsoft's acquisition of Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] was as much about Internet advertising as it was about software distribution. A half-billion users globally is the kind of audience worth everything Microsoft was offering, especially if it could reach that audience as potential Microsoft software and hardware customers.
It gets even more important when you grasp the concept of so-called "Cloud Computing," one of the key buzzwords in the business nowadays. Software hosted on Web sites instead of loaded onto your PC. Software downloaded from Web sites instead of purchased in a store. It's a concept put forth by salesforce.com [CRM
Loading...
()
] with a high degree of success. It's a concept embraced and espoused by Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] . It's something Time Warner [TWX
Loading...
()
] has talked about. Something important to Oracle [ORCL
Loading...
()
]. Microsoft needs a strategy here. Yahoo was almost like picking the low fruit.
But now Microsoft will be forced to get a little more creative. Could a Microsoft play for salesforce be in the cards? There had been a lot of discussion that salesforce would be a compelling deal for Google as the search giant seeks to do for corporate clients what it's already doing for consumers. Microsoft could use the algorithms and do much the same thing across enterprise and consumer customers.
And what about News Corp.? Seems Microsoft cozied up to Rupert Murdoch during the Yahoo negotiations; speculation is that News Corp. [NWS
Loading...
()
] isn't interested in Yahoo, or can't come up with enough cash on its own to offer a competing bid to what Microsoft already put forth.
So maybe News Corp. and Microsoft re-think their partnership and work together not just to take on Google, but Yahoo as well. MySpace doesn't seem to be the property it once was, when you see what other social networking sites like Facebook have become. But Yahoo today certainly isn't the property it once was either. And Microsoft already owns a small chunk of Facebook. Maybe it partners with News Corp. in some new, creative alliance that could be far cheaper than buying Yahoo, but could be far more effective at taking on Google?
More voices to the debate today:
JChang is ready to give Yahoo two years to get its shares up to the $37 that Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang thinks his company is worth. And if it doesn't happen, "then he should buy all the stock holders out at $37." My question: Why give Yahoo two years when you had a deal just a little below that right now, on the table, from Microsoft? Why wait?
Trientimp takes issue with Mary Ellen's quote in the last post: "She had a 50 percent premium when the stock ran up -- failed to sell it and now says 'Microsoft and Yahoo both screwed the Yahoo shareholders.' Greed -- it's the American weakness...unbelievable logic."
Pat wants to know, "How is it possible that the future of a giant public co. be decided by only two company officers?" And, "It's not fair that it only took two idiots to have the final say whether to accept the offer or not. Don't the millions of share holders have voting rights?" Well, actually, it was the entire board, but still!
Sinardy Xing suggests that "Yahoo should outsource the entire management team to Google, not only the Search department. Will Jerry (Yang) end up like Craig Conway from PeopleSoft?"
Also, to Yahoo's credit, the comments posted to Jerry Yang's blog this morning included some stinging criticism of Yang and the company's board. And Yahoo is posting all of them. Some do support the company, but by and large, the rebukes are biting. And certainly worth a read.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes