- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Another Music Lawsuit, but with an Unexpected Target
- Will Newspaper Readers Pay For Digital Content?
- Is Google Hurting Book Publishers?
- Supreme Court's Ruling A Blow To Big Media
- The "New" Michael Jackson Fortune
- Hollywood Cashing In On Financial Crisis
- GM Gives Hope To Ad Industry
- "Revenge of the Fallen's" Transforming Effect On Viacom, Hasbro And ...GM?
- Time Warner And Comcast Partner To Save Cable
More Videos
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Rich People With A Death Wish
- Facebook Director Sees 'Billions' in Revenue in 5 Years
- The Threat of Ballooning Pensions
- Lehman CEO: Firm Deserved Bailout or 'Wind Down'
- FedEx Sees Signs of a Turnaround: Report
- Texting And Driving Worse Than Drinking and Driving
- Market's Monday Blues
- Hey, What's Up Doc?
- Judge Gives Control of Jackson Estate to Executors
- March Lows Will Hold — So Buy Equities: Strategists
- Lacoste Runs Full Page Ad With Roddick Loss
- Brandt: Bing, The Little Search Engine That Couldn't
- 5-Star Manager's 5 Top Stocks
- Hey, What's Up Doc?
- Busch: Summertime Blues Hits Investors
- Chadwick: Recession and Scandals Pave the Way for Romney 2012
- Art Cashin: The S&P's 'Head and Shoulders' Number
- Michael Jackson: Death And Taxes
- Second Half: Wait For Pullbacks, Then Buy the Best
- Accused Ex-Goldman Sachs Programmer Out on Bail
- Discover Shares Fall on Word of Stock Offering
- California General Obligation Bond Rating Cut
- GM to Get Final $20 Billlion From US This Year
- World Trade Center Developer Threatens Arbitration
- The Weirdest Currencies on Earth
- Judge Gives Control of Jackson Estate to Executors
- Recession Special: Wine Cheaper Than Water!
Text Size 
 |
And when it comes to summer blockbusters, there's always one sneaky player no one talks about much: the products that are placed, often for high prices, in key scenes and in close proximity to stars.
Good product placement leaves you wondering if a company paid to get its name in lights, or if it was simply the filmmaker's choice. Bad product placement is obvious and annoying, makes you dislike both the movie and the product.
And then there's the whole range in-between, where most product placement falls. Take Marvel [MVL
Loading...
()
] /Paramount's "Iron Man." The lead character says he's dying for a burger, and then there are a couple choice shots of a Burger King [BKC
Loading...
()
] bag. If he'd said "I'm dying for Burger King" it would have been entirely unbelievable. The way the scene ran, it was clear, but not painful.
And you can tell Audi supplied the set with plenty of its cars. One scene plays like an ad for Audi antilock breaks. (I do think it's a little weird when it appears that 80 percent of the cars on the road in a movie are the same brand).
Last year "Transformers" had heavy General Motors [GM
Loading...
()
] product placement, its range of cars were effectively the stars of the film, turning into robots. That raised the question: Does product placement raise awareness of a product? or make you want to buy it?
I'm keeping an eye on product placement this summer, and its effectiveness. ("Sex & the City: The Movie" will be a phenomenal example, since the TV show has already been so phenomenally successful building brands).
The bigger budget a movie, the more product placement it's likely have to help absorb some of those costs.
Please e-mail me your favorite--or least favorite--examples of product placement this summer.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes