More Videos
- 3D's Tipping Point and Your Living Room
- Silicon Valley and Hollywood Now Fast Friends
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
MOST SHARED
- Ritz-Carlton ?Struggling? in the US: President
- Garlic Price Rises Surpass Gold, Stocks in China
- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head
- New-Home Sales Jump 6.2% To Highest Level in Over Year
- Oil Price to Average $75.40 in 2010: Poll
- Jobless Claims Below 500,000, Durable Orders Slip
- Americans Ditch Planes for Trains this Thanksgiving
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Consumer Mood Improves, But Anxiety Over Personal Finances
- Crescenzi: Claims Level Suggests End to Job Losses
- Hedge Funds Take Early Lead in Warren Buffett's 'Big Bet'
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- 4 Food Stocks to Stuff in Your Portfolio: Analyst
- S&P at 1050-1200 Trading Range Next Year: Strategist
- Treasury On Mortgage Modifications
- Blue Jeans Expected to See Another Green Christmas
- Investors Thankful for Gains This Year
- Thanksgiving & the Markets
- US Bonds Pare Losses After 7-Year Auction
- New-Home Sales Jump to Highest Level in Over Year
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Claims Level Suggests End to Job Losses
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- Consumer Mood Improves, but Anxiety Over Finances
- Airlines Hit With Penalties for Stranding Passengers
- Jobless Claims Below 500,000, Durable Orders Slip
- US Said It Will Reduce Emissions by 17% by 2020
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
Paul Sakuma / AP Yahoo!'s headquarters in California. |
And seeing as it was posted on the Yahoo-owned webcast, it smacks of a political propaganda video posted on a government controlled news outlet. It's a harsh assessment, but I think you'll agree when you analyze what is being said here.
I mean, does Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] really expect us to believe that the company didn't go to its major institutions with news of a raised Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] bid, after three months of back-and-forth, because the offer simply wasn't put in writing?
With the clock ticking, and the two sides glacially moving closer to a deal, and Yahoo's own admission that it had come back time and again with lower offers only to hear Microsoft continually standing pat, that at the precise moment that Microsoft finally DID budge, Yahoo decided not to share that salacious bit of info with its top investors? Come on.
It sounds an awful lot like Yahoo is trying to cover its fiduciary butt by notifying shareholders that the reason the deal fell through was not because of Yahoo's obstinance, or delusions of grandeur, but because of Microsoft's negotiating incompetence. Seriously, what kind of game is Yahoo playing here?
It's almost a kind of "gotcha" moment. Gee, a deal might happen guys, because once the institutions hear about this new offer at $33 they might pressure us to take it. Wait, we don't need to actually share it with them because it was never written down! Cool. Let's just keep saying Microsoft won't negotiate, or put something in writing, and maybe Microsoft will just walk away out of sheer frustration. Not to mention the bizarreness of the board agreeing on $37, only to have Yang and Filo tell Ballmer in person that THEIR price is still at $38.
You can't really blame Steve Ballmer here. He finds himself in the weird position of having to bid against himself with Yahoo's board and co-founders bidding against themselves. Microsoft raises to $33 and Yahoo won't move below $37. Or $38. Yahoo's institutions don't want Yahoo settling for anything less than what they think they can get. That's important, because if those institutions knew then what they know now, that Microsoft would actually walk away completely leaving Yahoo with nothing, I think they'd think differently about the whole deal.
Don't settle for anything less than $37, they might say, unless we could get $35, or $34, or $33 to prevent Microsoft from walking away all together. Ballmer's putting a 70 percent premium on the table, only to be met with bizarre boardroom behavior at Yahoo. How much is the guy supposed to take? So he called their bluff. And now Yahoo is in serious damage-control mode.
The whole thing smacks of gamesmanship, and not the good kind. Jerry Yang tells the New York Times he had "mixed feelings" about the Microsoft offer. Which one? The one in writing? Or the ones merely talked about?
The one thing all of this shows me is that Microsoft/Yahoo is not nearly over; that there has been no actual breakdown in negotiation. It's just that negotiations have moved locations: from the board room to the blogosphere, online, on the air, and in print, with both sides talking to the media, and letting us do the negotiations for them instead.
I still think a deal gets done.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes