More Videos
- iPhone, App Strategy the 'New Dot Com?'
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
- AMD's Ruiz Gets Tripped by Idle Chit-Chat
MOST SHARED
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- Future of Marketing
- Priceline Crushes Profit Forecasts; Shares Jump
- Mad Mail: Buy the Berkshire Hathaway Split?
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Oil Tomorrow
- Framed for Porn – By a PC Virus
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Warren Buffett to Sell Stakes In Union Pacific & Norfolk Southern
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Merck’s Mega-Monday Morning
- Why are Traders Bullish on This Food Company?
- Profiting From Natural Gas: Strategists
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Look Ahead: 'Risk On' Attitude Could Fuel Rally Further
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- JPMorgan Lifts Salary Freeze Amid Recovery
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Buffett to Sell Stakes in Norfolk Southern, Union Pacific
- Do You Know Your Coca-Cola Myths?
- Cramer: 5 Stocks to Play the Next Bull Run
- Electronic Arts Beats Street, Announces 1,500 Job Cuts
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
Paul Sakuma / AP Yahoo!'s headquarters in California. |
And seeing as it was posted on the Yahoo-owned webcast, it smacks of a political propaganda video posted on a government controlled news outlet. It's a harsh assessment, but I think you'll agree when you analyze what is being said here.
I mean, does Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] really expect us to believe that the company didn't go to its major institutions with news of a raised Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] bid, after three months of back-and-forth, because the offer simply wasn't put in writing?
With the clock ticking, and the two sides glacially moving closer to a deal, and Yahoo's own admission that it had come back time and again with lower offers only to hear Microsoft continually standing pat, that at the precise moment that Microsoft finally DID budge, Yahoo decided not to share that salacious bit of info with its top investors? Come on.
It sounds an awful lot like Yahoo is trying to cover its fiduciary butt by notifying shareholders that the reason the deal fell through was not because of Yahoo's obstinance, or delusions of grandeur, but because of Microsoft's negotiating incompetence. Seriously, what kind of game is Yahoo playing here?
It's almost a kind of "gotcha" moment. Gee, a deal might happen guys, because once the institutions hear about this new offer at $33 they might pressure us to take it. Wait, we don't need to actually share it with them because it was never written down! Cool. Let's just keep saying Microsoft won't negotiate, or put something in writing, and maybe Microsoft will just walk away out of sheer frustration. Not to mention the bizarreness of the board agreeing on $37, only to have Yang and Filo tell Ballmer in person that THEIR price is still at $38.
You can't really blame Steve Ballmer here. He finds himself in the weird position of having to bid against himself with Yahoo's board and co-founders bidding against themselves. Microsoft raises to $33 and Yahoo won't move below $37. Or $38. Yahoo's institutions don't want Yahoo settling for anything less than what they think they can get. That's important, because if those institutions knew then what they know now, that Microsoft would actually walk away completely leaving Yahoo with nothing, I think they'd think differently about the whole deal.
Don't settle for anything less than $37, they might say, unless we could get $35, or $34, or $33 to prevent Microsoft from walking away all together. Ballmer's putting a 70 percent premium on the table, only to be met with bizarre boardroom behavior at Yahoo. How much is the guy supposed to take? So he called their bluff. And now Yahoo is in serious damage-control mode.
The whole thing smacks of gamesmanship, and not the good kind. Jerry Yang tells the New York Times he had "mixed feelings" about the Microsoft offer. Which one? The one in writing? Or the ones merely talked about?
The one thing all of this shows me is that Microsoft/Yahoo is not nearly over; that there has been no actual breakdown in negotiation. It's just that negotiations have moved locations: from the board room to the blogosphere, online, on the air, and in print, with both sides talking to the media, and letting us do the negotiations for them instead.
I still think a deal gets done.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes