- Bowyer: Back to Monarchy in Land Rights?
- Parking Cash in European Telecoms
- Bargain Stocks: Nokia, Spectra, Incitex Pivot
- Sticker Shock: Fast Money's Inflation Special
- Our Favorite Inflation Trades
- Warren Buffett's Annual Stock Gift to Gates Foundation Worth $1.8B This Year
- That '70's Trade
- The Villain Of Our Story
- The Blame Game
- EU Opens Probe in BHP Billiton Bid for Rio Tinto
- Worse Car Sales Decline Expected in Western Europe
- Euro Banks Need to Raise $90-$140 Billion: Goldman
- BSkyB Mulls $4 Billion Bid for Spain's Digital Plus: FT
- On the Bright Side, Shopping Bargains Abound
- Euro Stocks Fall as Goldman Note Hits Banks
- Return of Asian Currency Crisis Is Unlikely: ADB
- European Shares Set to Open Flat as Holiday Shuts US
- Airbus to Sell Five A380s to Japan's ANA: Nikkei

![]() |
AP |
It is irrefutable that sales in April were much better than expected. Sixty-one percent of stores beat expectations and 39% missed expectations.
These results were a much-needed confidence booster for the retail industry. But a word of warning to optimists: read beyond the numbers when you’re looking at sales results at Wal-Mart [WMT
Loading...
()
] , Saks [SKS
Loading...
()
] and Costco [COST
Loading...
()
] .
Price and necessity are the key motivators for consumers now. This is a Wal-Mart’s economy as people are buying bargain staples like food and groceries. That’s why the world’s biggest discounter posted a surprising 3.2% gain while competitor Target posted a weaker than expected 3.1% increase. Why?
As Jeff Klinefelter of Piper Jaffray points out--Target and Wal-Mart run fundamentally different businesses. Around forty percent of Target’s business comes from sales of discretionary items like clothing. Necessity versus discretion is the dividing line between retailers right now.
related content |
Department stores also reflect this trend. While high-end Saks posted a whopping 23.9% sales gain, the store reported that much of that strength came from sales of marked down items. In fact, Saks management estimates that if the store had not instituted promotional price cuts, April’s sales would have increased by just high-single digits. The same factor propped up JC Penney’s [JCP
Loading...
()
] results minimizing the decline to just down 1.7% on the month.
The teen retailers saw a similar boost from pent-up demand.
So--a word of caution: this is not a comeback. Today’s results are like a slightly lower fever on a sick patient. The risk factors are all still there, the illness is still in the symptom but the consumer is showing signs of life. Though for today, at least, retailers can exhale a sigh of relief.
Questions? Comments?





