More Videos
- iPhone, App Strategy the 'New Dot Com?'
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
- AMD's Ruiz Gets Tripped by Idle Chit-Chat
MOST SHARED
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- Israel: Leader of Business Innovation
- Justices Poke Fun at Patents for the Abstract
- Mad Mail: Buy the Berkshire Hathaway Split?
- Cramer: 5 Stocks to Play the Next Bull Run
- Warren Buffett and the Crisis: 'Brilliant Moves Interspersed with Some Surprising Errors'
- Schork Oil Outlook: More Strength in Crude
- Chrysler Makes Smart Call Staying Unplugged—For Now
- Your Next Move: Thriving and Managing in Limbo
- Yankees Team Signed Ball Selling For $3,500
- Pociask: In The Electronics War Does The Consumer Really Win?
- Why are Options Bullish on This Smartphone Maker?
- Is 10% Unemployment Good for Stocks?
- Moon Hopes To Complete Amazing Story
- New Lows for Stocks Next Year: Equities Bear
- AIG Moving Toward Repaying Bailout: Moody's
- Peak Oil Closer Than IEA Forecasts Show: Report
- Yahoo Is in Expanding Mode, Hiring: CEO
- Stocks Keep on Ticking as Dollar Takes a Licking
- News Corp. May Pull Content From Google Searches
- In Electronics War, Does Consumer Really Win?
- Justices Poke Fun at Patents for the Abstract
- Your Next Move: Thriving and Managing in Limbo
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
I have just spoken with Jackson, who runs Ironhorse Capital and whose 150 members hold 3.3 million shares of Yahoo stock [YHOO
Loading...
()
], and he tells me the $1 million cost to mount a proxy war was simply too prohibitive for him and his team. He tells me he has spoken to a number of hedge funds and asset managers who fully supported a competing slate, but that their message was clear: "We can't support you because we don't want to be painted as activists."
Many outsiders thought that Jackson was the most likely individual to put together a group of dissident investors and a competing slate of directors to run against the current Yahoo board.
Instead, Jackson will proceed with what he calls a vigorous "vote-no" campaign against Yahoo's existing board. And he promises a far more vocal campaign than the one he mounted last year, which some experts say was instrumental in the later ouster of Yahoo CEO Terry Semel.
Last year's campaign led to three directors receiving a surprising 36 percent "no vote," and he says that with the meeting this year not until July, he and his group will have additional time to wage an even more effective campaign.
As far as whether someone will step forward with a competing slate of directors, Jackson tells me he isn't hopeful. "I just hope they won't take the approach that, 'We'll get $31 or $33 a share so vote us in.' Instead, they should say, 'We want a better board, a more independent board that truly represents the voices of the shareholders.'"
He says he's aware of speculation that Carl Icahn may run his own board by launching a proxy war of his own, but that Yahoo's board will likely escape the proxy battle many thought was an almost certainty after the $47 billion unsolicited bid from Microsoft was ultimately shelved.
The deadline for a competing slate of directors to be nominated is Thursday, May 15. Of course, Yahoo just recently, through some work with Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] and discussions with AOL [TWX
Loading...
()
], ducked a Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] overture.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes