Tech Check
More Videos
MOST SHARED
- Zero China Growth Is ‘Probable’: Gordon Chang
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- China Growth Risks Signal Need for Fiscal Action
- Senate Summons Dimon to 'Get to the Bottom' of JPM Mess
- What College Tuition Will Look Like in 18 Years
- Romney Leads Poll Of Small Business Owners
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Bacon Tourism: From the Davos of Bacon to Bacon Mecca
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- Sticker Shock: What College Is Likely to Cost in 18 Years
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- Spain to Inject Emergency 19 Billion Euros into Bankia
- EU Set to Launch Action Against China Over Telecom Aid
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- Marc Faber: Chance of Global Recession Is Now 100%
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- Cool Jobs: From Gold Stacker to Bed Tester
RSS FEED
Yahoo Escapes Ironhorse Grip; For Now
Text Size 
Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
 |
I have just spoken with Jackson, who runs Ironhorse Capital and whose 150 members hold 3.3 million shares of Yahoo stock [YHOO
Loading...
()
], and he tells me the $1 million cost to mount a proxy war was simply too prohibitive for him and his team. He tells me he has spoken to a number of hedge funds and asset managers who fully supported a competing slate, but that their message was clear: "We can't support you because we don't want to be painted as activists."
Many outsiders thought that Jackson was the most likely individual to put together a group of dissident investors and a competing slate of directors to run against the current Yahoo board.
Instead, Jackson will proceed with what he calls a vigorous "vote-no" campaign against Yahoo's existing board. And he promises a far more vocal campaign than the one he mounted last year, which some experts say was instrumental in the later ouster of Yahoo CEO Terry Semel.
Last year's campaign led to three directors receiving a surprising 36 percent "no vote," and he says that with the meeting this year not until July, he and his group will have additional time to wage an even more effective campaign.
As far as whether someone will step forward with a competing slate of directors, Jackson tells me he isn't hopeful. "I just hope they won't take the approach that, 'We'll get $31 or $33 a share so vote us in.' Instead, they should say, 'We want a better board, a more independent board that truly represents the voices of the shareholders.'"
He says he's aware of speculation that Carl Icahn may run his own board by launching a proxy war of his own, but that Yahoo's board will likely escape the proxy battle many thought was an almost certainty after the $47 billion unsolicited bid from Microsoft was ultimately shelved.
The deadline for a competing slate of directors to be nominated is Thursday, May 15. Of course, Yahoo just recently, through some work with Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] and discussions with AOL [TWX
Loading...
()
], ducked a Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] overture.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
