RSS FEED
- CNBC Anchor Takes a Sabbatical
- Links: More Important Than We May Think
- Changing What Was Said
- Radio Rounds: A Job Loss and Education
- A Big Net Deal: Getting Staff's Attention
- Site Hot Links? Fear and Greed
- Balloon Boy: Not Your Average Business Story
- Hot Items: Gold, Gifts and Gritty Prison Fights
- Hot Links for Monday
MOST SHARED
- Garlic Price Rises Surpass Gold, Stocks in China
- Ritz-Carlton ?Struggling? in the US: President
- New-Home Sales Jump 6.2% To Highest Level in Over Year
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- The Executive Job Search
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- US Plans to Reduce Emissions By 17% Within Next Ten Years
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Giving Thanks: Seymour
- Your Questions About... Alcoa & The Dollar
- Best Wishes Regis
- Gartman's Annual Rules For Trading
- Chartology: December Outlook
- Holiday Toy Trades
- UPDATE: Even More Of Our Best Black Friday Trades
- Use 2003 As Template For 2009, Says Terranova
- Revenge of the Gangsta Nerds
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
Text Size 
If you like stock advice and need stock advice then you should check out our stock advice section because it has various bits of stock advice from experts who make their living giving stock advice.
Did you like that paragraph? Me neither. But a search engine optimization consultant would love it.
That's because it repeats a key phrase that people are likely to search on -- "stock advice" -- several times. That, plus using the phrase in various parts or "tags" of the Web page structure, means this item could appear first in a Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] or Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] search on "stock advice." That would translate into more clicks back to this site. Hence, the piece is "optimized" for maximum search engine exposure. The soul less Web manager in me thinks that is good.
But the writer and journalist in me thinks that it is bad. From high school English we learn that using the same phrase over and over again in a paragraph or sentence is bad diction ... it's repetitive. It makes for bad reading.
And in a journalistic point of view, you should be more about telling the tale, not what search engines are going to look for. Sure, plenty of news copy can fit into the search optimization mold. But how about stories with anecdotal or first-person quote leads? Those don't meet the search engine optimization bill. But sometimes they are the best way to relate a story.
The search engine optimization consultant would argue (I know because I've argued with them a lot) that a nicely written story doesn't do any good if no one sees it. Journalists would counter that a snazzy headline often gets more eyeballs than a straightforward one does. And so on, and so on ....
Hey, I like traffic. And so I listen to most of what the search engine optimization folks say. Most of the time it's not that big an issue. And people do a lot of their Internet searching via engine. I know my competitors are talking to their consultants, just like I talk to mine, about how to take advantage of that.
But I try to balance the practice. I get emails complaining about bad grammar and bad diction, both on the Web and on TV, so I know at least you care. Well, some of you. When you are not looking for stock advice.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes