- Microsoft's Ballmer Addresses Analysts
- Microsoft's Johnson: What His Leaving Means For Company
- Apple Tells Us Everything Without Saying Anything
- Amazon's Tall Order for Earnings
- Sue Decker Sounds Off on Yahoo, Icahn, Microsoft
- Yahoo Underwhelms; Ready to Deal?
- Earnings Preview: Yahoo's Future Hangs In The Balance
- Steve Jobs "Health" Issue Just Gets Curiouser And Curiouser
- Apple: Even With Disappointment, Still Good For Long Term
- Preview: Apple Earnings Not Just About iPhone
- Comicon: Not Just Funny Business
- See What People Are Saying About... Water Scarcity
- Microsoft's Ballmer Addresses Analysts
- Fast Money: Wall Street Got Drunk!
- Play the Coming Power-Grid Upgrade
- Microsoft's Johnson: What His Leaving Means For Company
- Essential Oils For Your Portfolio
- Building a Portfolio With Pulte (!)
- Facebook CEO Zuckerberg: The Power To Share Connections
- Gassing Up With Garbage
- UBS Target of Fraud Suit from NY Attorney General
- SEC Plans to Broaden Curbs on Short Sales: Cox
- 30-Year Bond Gains Full Point as Stocks Weaken
- FCC Agrees to Approve Sirius Pruchase of XM: Report
- Union Pacific Profit Rises, Beats Estimates
- Bristol Profit Beats Forecasts, Helped by Plavix
- Jobless Benefit Claims Rise above 400,000
- 3M Profit Up 3%, Tops Estimates

![]() |
Shiho Fukada / AP Carl Icahn |
In today's New York Times, Legg Mason's Bill Miller is quoted as saying, "It isn't Yahoo that walked away from the deal. It is Microsoft who walked away from the deal." Miller says there was "no indication at all from the independent directors that they were anything other than diligent in their duties."
Diligent, maybe. But independent?
The fact is, negotiations didn't need to end, if these two companies simply wanted to continue them. Sounds facile, but hear me out: A source close to Microsoft says, "Instead of high-fiving, (Yang) should have said, 'Steve, let's talk.'"
I'm told that after a 4-plus hour meeting between Jerry Yang and David Filo with Steve Ballmer, the Yahoo co-founders stood pat on their own, personal $38 price-tag. That Yahoo's [YHOO
Loading...
()
] board didn't budge from $37. And that Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] came up to $33.
There seems to be a lot of disagreement over how to properly characterize these negotiations but what doesn't seem to be in doubt: Yahoo had an ask; Microsoft had a bid; Microsoft's bid changed; Yahoo's ask didn't. Nor did Yang and Filo's. Miller and Yahoo may want to paint Microsoft as the one picking up all its marbles and walking from the deal, but that decision wasn't made willy-nilly.
related content |
It's all a matter of perspective, I suppose, and not having been in the room with these principals, it's tough to get the real truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
So here we are, on the eve of the slate-nominee deadline. Yang's reputation has been sullied. But he may yet survive if Icahn's blustering doesn't translate into a new board of directors. And even if he does, there's hardly a guarantee that the new board could persuade Microsoft to return to the negotiating table. And if it does, would Microsoft still be in a mood to offer a 70 percent premium for a brand that's done its fair share of sullying Microsoft's reputation?
Icahn makes things interesting, but certainly not a done deal that Yahoo gets swallowed up. I still think a deal gets done with Microsoft. Eventually. Meantime, pay attention to the nuances from both sides about exactly what went down in these negotiations. And prepare yourself for Yahoo's July 3 shareholders meeting. That might be the best ticket in town. And some day--maybe that day--the real story is bound to come out.
Questions? Comments?





