- iPhone, App Strategy the 'New Dot Com?'
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
- AMD's Ruiz Gets Tripped by Idle Chit-Chat
MOST SHARED
- Future of Marketing
- Rock Band Weezer Uses Snuggie to Promote New Album
- Oil Tomorrow
- Dow Industrials at New Highs—But Other Indices Lag
- Priceline Crushes Profit Forecasts; Shares Jump
- Home Prices Start to Stabilize In the US as Sales Pick Up
- Dow Up Over 100 After G20 Stimulus Pledge
- Should an Idea Be Patented? Supreme Court to Decide Case
- Goldman Sachs Head Says Banks Do 'God's Work'
- Warren Buffett to Sell Stakes In Union Pacific & Norfolk Southern
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Merck’s Mega-Monday Morning
- Why are Traders Bullish on This Food Company?
- Profiting From Natural Gas: Strategists
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Shopping for Answers
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Buffett to Sell Stakes in Norfolk Southern, Union Pacific
- Do You Know Your Coca-Cola Myths?
- Electronic Arts Beats Street, Announces 1,500 Job Cuts
- Time Is Here to Look at Overseas Stocks: Bill Gross
- Home Prices Start to Stabilize In the US as Sales Pick Up
- Flaw in US Data Overstates Growth, Productivity
- Priceline Crushes Profit Forecasts; Shares Jump
- 'Modern Warfare 2' May Be Biggest Event This Year
RSS FEED
Tech Check
![]() |
Shiho Fukada / AP Carl Icahn |
In today's New York Times, Legg Mason's Bill Miller is quoted as saying, "It isn't Yahoo that walked away from the deal. It is Microsoft who walked away from the deal." Miller says there was "no indication at all from the independent directors that they were anything other than diligent in their duties."
Diligent, maybe. But independent?
The fact is, negotiations didn't need to end, if these two companies simply wanted to continue them. Sounds facile, but hear me out: A source close to Microsoft says, "Instead of high-fiving, (Yang) should have said, 'Steve, let's talk.'"
I'm told that after a 4-plus hour meeting between Jerry Yang and David Filo with Steve Ballmer, the Yahoo co-founders stood pat on their own, personal $38 price-tag. That Yahoo's [YHOO
Loading...
()
] board didn't budge from $37. And that Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] came up to $33.
There seems to be a lot of disagreement over how to properly characterize these negotiations but what doesn't seem to be in doubt: Yahoo had an ask; Microsoft had a bid; Microsoft's bid changed; Yahoo's ask didn't. Nor did Yang and Filo's. Miller and Yahoo may want to paint Microsoft as the one picking up all its marbles and walking from the deal, but that decision wasn't made willy-nilly.
It's all a matter of perspective, I suppose, and not having been in the room with these principals, it's tough to get the real truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
So here we are, on the eve of the slate-nominee deadline. Yang's reputation has been sullied. But he may yet survive if Icahn's blustering doesn't translate into a new board of directors. And even if he does, there's hardly a guarantee that the new board could persuade Microsoft to return to the negotiating table. And if it does, would Microsoft still be in a mood to offer a 70 percent premium for a brand that's done its fair share of sullying Microsoft's reputation?
Icahn makes things interesting, but certainly not a done deal that Yahoo gets swallowed up. I still think a deal gets done with Microsoft. Eventually. Meantime, pay attention to the nuances from both sides about exactly what went down in these negotiations. And prepare yourself for Yahoo's July 3 shareholders meeting. That might be the best ticket in town. And some day--maybe that day--the real story is bound to come out.
Questions? Comments?










