- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Blog You!!!
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED

![]() |
Shiho Fukada / AP Carl Icahn |
In today's New York Times, Legg Mason's Bill Miller is quoted as saying, "It isn't Yahoo that walked away from the deal. It is Microsoft who walked away from the deal." Miller says there was "no indication at all from the independent directors that they were anything other than diligent in their duties."
Diligent, maybe. But independent?
The fact is, negotiations didn't need to end, if these two companies simply wanted to continue them. Sounds facile, but hear me out: A source close to Microsoft says, "Instead of high-fiving, (Yang) should have said, 'Steve, let's talk.'"
I'm told that after a 4-plus hour meeting between Jerry Yang and David Filo with Steve Ballmer, the Yahoo co-founders stood pat on their own, personal $38 price-tag. That Yahoo's [YHOO
Loading...
()
] board didn't budge from $37. And that Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] came up to $33.
There seems to be a lot of disagreement over how to properly characterize these negotiations but what doesn't seem to be in doubt: Yahoo had an ask; Microsoft had a bid; Microsoft's bid changed; Yahoo's ask didn't. Nor did Yang and Filo's. Miller and Yahoo may want to paint Microsoft as the one picking up all its marbles and walking from the deal, but that decision wasn't made willy-nilly.
It's all a matter of perspective, I suppose, and not having been in the room with these principals, it's tough to get the real truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
So here we are, on the eve of the slate-nominee deadline. Yang's reputation has been sullied. But he may yet survive if Icahn's blustering doesn't translate into a new board of directors. And even if he does, there's hardly a guarantee that the new board could persuade Microsoft to return to the negotiating table. And if it does, would Microsoft still be in a mood to offer a 70 percent premium for a brand that's done its fair share of sullying Microsoft's reputation?
Icahn makes things interesting, but certainly not a done deal that Yahoo gets swallowed up. I still think a deal gets done with Microsoft. Eventually. Meantime, pay attention to the nuances from both sides about exactly what went down in these negotiations. And prepare yourself for Yahoo's July 3 shareholders meeting. That might be the best ticket in town. And some day--maybe that day--the real story is bound to come out.
Questions? Comments?







