- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
- HP's Shot Across Cisco's Bow
- Back Off, Regulators!
- iPhone, App Strategy the 'New Dot Com?'
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
MOST SHARED
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates Share Their 'Optimism' With Eager Columbia Business Students
- Cities With the Most Home Price Reductions
- Disney Profit, Sales Top Street Forecasts; Shares Jump
- Warren Buffett's $100,000 Offer and $500,000 Advice for Columbia Business School Students
- Meet The Leaders of the New Retail Revolution
- Disney CFO and Parks Chief to Swap Roles
- Despite Rhetoric, Obama Has Limited Options To Boost Jobs
- Is Euphoric Market Ignoring Warning Signs?
- Housing Recovery 'Still In Uncharted Territory': HUD Secretary
- Microsoft's Bill Gates Praises Apple's Steve Jobs For 'Saving the Company'
- Gold Is a Bad Inflation Hedge—Like Oil: Stock Picker
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- US 'Actively Working' on Weaker Dollar: Fund Manager
- Options Boil on Biotech Buyout Rumors
- Warren Buffett's $100,000 Offer and $500,000 Advice for Columbia Business School Students
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- 5-Star Manager's 5 Stocks for Changing Markets
- What's The Forecast from Retailers? Proceed With Caution
- Job Market Politics to Keep Interest Rates Low
- AIG, Symbol of Crisis, Watches Its Stock Zoom Back
- Disney Profit, Sales Top Street Forecasts; Shares Jump
- Bill Gates Praises Apple's Jobs for 'Saving the Company'
- Cities With the Most Home Price Reductions
- Cramer: The Real Reason Stocks Fell Thursday
- Is Euphoric Market Ignoring Warning Signs?
- Video Game Sales Plunge, but Have They Hit Bottom?
- Despite Rhetoric, Obama Has Few Options to Boost Jobs
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Another weekend, another round of dueling press releases from Microsoft and Yahoo, and if there were ever a clearer example of the PR 8-ball behind which Yahoo finds itself, I don't recall one.
Here's why: Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] "moves on," and Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] beats its chest, originally because it repelled the Microsoft hostile bid, but then ultimately because Yahoo would go it alone and execute on a financial plan few on Wall Street find even remotely feasible.
![]() |
AP Yahoo!'s headquarters in California. |
Microsoft sits back and watches as institution after institution, investor after investor, pundit after pundit, analyst after analyst, make fun of Jerry Yang and company for missing out on a $47 billion opportunity.
But one of those investors, Carl Icahn, decided to take a more active approach, plunking down a $1 billion for 50 million shares, and offering up his own slate of directors to run against the board that shunned Microsoft. He wants to stir things up, and make a little scratch for himself along the way.
And therein lies the problem for Yahoo in this can't-win-if-you're-Yahoo's-board situation. When the news broke Sunday afternoon that talks between Microsoft and Yahoo had resumed, the news didn't come from Yahoo. It came from a Microsoft release, vague that it was. I'm told Microsoft executives felt the negotiations were "material" and needed to be disclosed. So it beat Yahoo to the press release punch. This is more significant than you think. It continues the perception that Microsoft is still in charge, that Yahoo is still its hunted prey, and still very vulnerable.
Yahoo's meek response that "its Board of Directors continue to consider a number of value-maximizing strategic alternatives for Yahoo" (though none has truly materialized since Microsoft's original bid was made public), and that "the company will evaluate each of its alternatives, including any Microsoft proposal," still shows a duck and cover strategy. Which is unfortunate.
The problem for Yahoo is that had it come out with the news first, that talks -- such that they are -- had resumed, it would have looked instantly like Carl Icahn had dragged Yang back to the negotiation table kicking and screaming like a petulant little child. The trouble is, it looks like that anyway. I heard two separate guests on CNBC this morning use the term "grabbing Yang by the ear," referring to Icahn.
Still, had Yahoo come out first, and announced the resumption of negotiations, it could have sculpted the news the way it wanted to; that Yahoo had come up with a way to bring Microsoft back to the table, that creativity rules the day and that Yahoo's board is working on a way to snatch victory from the jaws of financial defeat. Instead, it just looks like Yahoo is blowing where the wind takes it, whether the hot air is coming from Microsoft or Icahn himself.
Both sides do agree that a complete take-out, in the spirit of what Microsoft originally proposed, is not back on the table. Yet. And that can't make Icahn happy, even though I'm sure he was instrumental in getting any talks to resume. That's because if you're trying to figure out the quickest way for Yahoo to hit $33 or $34 a share, it's likely not half-way steps built on a "partnership" with Microsoft. The fastest way is to take the deal Microsoft was proposing. But maybe these baby steps will get these two to talk more seriously, and openly, and specifically, about that original proposal. Talk is always good; trouble is, until now, talk's been cheap.
I can't wait to hear Icahn's response to all this. If this new round of talks doesn't go anywhere, Icahn will go nuclear, and July 3, the date of Yahoo's shareholder meeting -- a long weekend for all of us -- could turn into the longest weekend of Jerry Yang's life.
Questions? Comments?









