Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 04:01:38 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30001682
powered by digg
Fast Money DisclaimerFast Money BiosAbout Fast MoneyRapid RecapFast Money Home
Text Size
May.21
11:57 AM ET
Wednesday, 21 May 2008
Read What's Boring ... It's Good for You

Do you read our disclaimers? No, of course not. People generally don't read boring stuff, even though they should.

We had an instance of that right here in the CNBC.com offices. We had a little software change for our Content Management System (the software we use to get our stories and video up on the site where you can see them). The tech folks sent out various emails warning folks that there would be cyber hiccups in the usual routine and what to do about them.

Unfortunately, a few people didn't read the emails. And who could blame them? Technical talk is pretty dry stuff. And so hiccups became convulsions in a few cases. (Now there are other things I could pound on our tech department about, but I'll lay off here).

Now, I caught a stock picker type on our air the other day recommending Clorox stock [CLX  Loading...      ()   ] as a summer play. Why? Because, he argued, it owns the Kingsford charcoal brand and summer grilling may skew to charcoal because of rising energy costs.

more from Allen Wastler

Allen Wastler
Managing Editor, CNBC.com

Hmmmm .... really? There's a lot more to Clorox than charcoal. With gasoline rising and the economy sputtering, some of its other consumer brands could take a hit. Maybe charcoal will do great, but salad dressing will take a hit? I just don't think Clorox qualifies as a pure charcoal play.

"Hope people read the disclaimer," I found myself thinking. But of course I know they don't. Disclaimers make lawyers happy and that's about it. It makes them feel safe that if some dunderhead gambles the farm on a TV comment, they won't sue. Or at least won't win. Why we need that protection baffles me sometimes, but then the legal system does some strange things from time to time.

Unfortunately, dislcaimers don't teach people critical thinking which, more often than not, is what is really called for.

Maybe if we spruced disclaimers up, more people would read them and at least start thinking about other sides to an argument. And if we spruced up tech emails, people would read those too? Okay, I'm dreaming.

Anyway, I just wanted to stress to people to read the disclaimers from time to time.


Questions? Comments? We want to hear from you:
Name:
Email Address
(not displayed):
City and State:
Your question or comment:

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Tools:
PrintEmailAdd This share icon
Next Post
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:02:29 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:02:29 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 01:02:29 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:02:29 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters