- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Eyeing the Growth at CBS
- Is Oprah Ready to Go on Her OWN?
- Time Warner Cable's Earnings Drop But Beat Expectations
- Scripps Networks Interactive Buys Stake in Travel Channel
- News Corp Emerging From Bottom of Cycle: Murdoch
- Time Warner Raises Forecast, Focuses on Exploiting Content
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Eyeing the Growth at CBS
- Is Oprah Ready to Go on Her OWN?
- Time Warner Cable's Earnings Drop But Beat Expectations
- Scripps Networks Interactive Buys Stake in Travel Channel
- News Corp Emerging From Bottom of Cycle: Murdoch
- Time Warner Raises Forecast, Focuses on Exploiting Content
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Future of Marketing
- Oil Tomorrow
- Dow Up Over 100 After G20 Stimulus Pledge
- Obama Says Will Raise Currency Issue with China
- Priceline Crushes Profit Forecasts; Shares Jump
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Maria's Market Message
- A Year on, China's Stimulus Postpones its Problems
- Trial of Ex-Bear Stearns Managers Goes to Jury
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Warren Buffett to Sell Stakes In Union Pacific & Norfolk Southern
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Merck’s Mega-Monday Morning
- Why are Traders Bullish on This Food Company?
- Profiting From Natural Gas: Strategists
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Surcharge Appealing to Limit Bank Size: Fed's Tarullo
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- Obama Says Will Raise Currency Issue with China
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Buffett to Sell Stakes in Norfolk Southern, Union Pacific
- Cramer: 5 Stocks to Play the Next Bull Run
- Do You Know Your Coca-Cola Myths?
- Electronic Arts Beats Street, Announces 1,500 Job Cuts
- Time Is Here to Look at Overseas Stocks: Bill Gross
Media Money
In this era of web 2.0 nothing is sacred, EVERYTHING is public, and pretty much anyone can be a laptop voyeur into everything from your neighbor's tax bill to your friend's holiday bonus.
The company describes itself as "Tripadvisor of the workplace," others would call it "salary porn." Its beta site launched this Tuesday night, and it's already attracted hundreds of people to give their info, and I would guess equal numbers of devotees.
Back in Internet 1.0 Vault.com was the employee-rating site everyone talked about--I remember checking it out when I was first job hunting. But Glassdoor has a bunch more features, and unlike vault.com, it's all free. That is, free if you're willing to pony up your own data, anonymously of course.
As much as I'd love to voyeuristically read all about the employment landscape I can't say I'd feel comfortable about offering my own info. I'm sure NBC Universal wouldn't want to encourage such behavior, to say the least. Glassdoor checks your e-mail address and its staffers contact you if there are any questions of authenticity. If you don't mind sharing, you can peruse all sorts of data, and when it comes to salary info, you can graph and sort by employee function.
What's the juiciest stuff? Well, during this beta period you can see -- without giving any info yourself -- info for Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
], Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
], Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] and Cisco [CSCO
Loading...
()
]. Lucky Google engineers don't just get unlimited free gourmet food, they also make between $80,000 and $150,000. Microsoft and Yahoo engineers average around the same. Reportedly, Apple[AAPL
Loading...
()
] engineers make less but when I just checked the site, it appears that you'll have to pony up some of your own numbers to see info on Apple.
It seems like the perfect tool for those job hunting-- they don't care about giving up info about their current gig, and they can search for comments and numbers about their fantasy position. It's not scientifically accurate -- it's only based on the numbers people volunteer. In contrast Salary.com [SLRY
Loading...
()
] works with large data sets reported by employers. I find the personal touch of these reviews and these numbers that much more compelling.
Questions? Comments?









