Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Commercial Conundrum
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Bank-owned Inventory: Move it!
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Dykstra Discusses Bankruptcy
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED

![]() |
Allan Ferguson California Suburbs |
The drive now costs far more as do the utility bills to heat and cool the larger home. Cities are taking advantage by investing more money in metro and downtown amenities and everyone is flocking back to city-center. Home builder/developers who bet on the "ex-urbs" might as well have bet on Mars.
Hogwash. Sit down with a pencil and paper and calculate exactly how much more you are spending a week on gasoline as compared to what you spent five years ago. Say you drive 50 miles a day to and from your office even, which is 250 miles a week. Say you get 15 miles to the gallon on average. You're using about 17 gallons a week for your work commute. If you were paying two dollars a gallon five years ago that's $34/week. Now you're paying twice that, so it's $68/wk. If your suburban house is big, you probably have higher utility costs now too, but your home is likely pretty new, and more energy efficient.
Now let's talk about the city. Your property taxes will be higher. Your supermarket and restaurant costs will be higher. You will likely live in an older house that will leak hot/cold air like a sieve and require more repairs. Basic services like the dry cleaner, the tailor, the liquor store, the bagel bakery, will cost slightly more because they're all paying higher rent. Urban school systems, like here in DC, can't hold a candle to those nice sprawling green suburban schools, and you might feel forced to send your kids to private school (try $15-20,000/yr per kid).
If you work, which you probably do, since you're commuting so much, then you'll need after school activities for your kids, which will of course cost far more in an urban setting than out in the 'burbs. And since you're living in the city, you probably don't want your kids just "hanging out" because you don't have a big house or a big yard, and so they'll want to hang out somewhere you probably don't want them to be.
I could go on and on. The reason today's new home sales numbers are down has nothing to do with real gas prices. If anyone is opting for an urban home over a new development, it's either because they know they'll see better appreciation or because they have some psychological fear of energy prices that is not based on real numbers.
Questions? Comments?










