- These Poker Stories Are No Bluff
- Did Matsui Make Contract Money Last Night?
- Adidas Out At UCF After MJ's Son Wears Jordans
- If Yanks Win, Merchandise Will Fly Off Shelves
- Final World Series Games Big Money Makers
- What I Got Wrong About Keflezighi
- Marathon's Headline Win Is Empty
- New Cubs Owner Tom Ricketts Goes One-on-One With "SportsBiz"
- Roger Federer Signs With Chocolate Brand Deal
- Marshall Fogel: A Collector's Profile
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Sweeping Health Care Overhaul Bill Passes House
- US Becomes Top Country Brand Under Obama: Survey
- BofA Board in Civil War Over Lewis' Succesor
- Framed for Porn – By a PC Virus
- Kraft to Formalize Hostile Cadbury Bid on Monday
- What Stocks to Buy Amid Health Care Overhaul: Strategist
- Obama Delays Start of Asia Trip to Attend Memorial
- GE, Comcast Agree on NBC Universal Valuation
- Tamminen: Why Does Oklahoma Want To Drown New York?
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Tommy Lee, Medical Tourism and Nasty Santa, Your Emails
- U.S. Markets Gain 3% for the Week Despite 10.2% Unemployment
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Rockwell Automation Earnings: What Options Are Saying
- Gold Will Touch Higher Lows and Higher Highs: Analyst
- Is Misery Alive And Well in Your Office?
- M. Stanley Looks to Sell China Investment Bank Stake
- Fed's Bullard: Tighten Only When Recovery's 'Solid'
- Ida Downgraded to Category 1 Hurricane
- Kraft to Formalize Hostile Cadbury Bid on Monday
- GE, Comcast Agree on NBC Universal Valuation
- Hottest Zip Codes for Home Prices
- US Home Values Follow Sales Higher, For Some
- China Urges US to Control Deficit to Stabilize Dollar
- US Health Care Reforms Face Tough Path in Senate
Sports Biz
![]() |
Should Sponsors Get Money Back If Athlete Is No Show |
So not only is Tiger not playing, he's not even shaking hands. That's a tough pill to swallow for sponsors, who I can't imagine had any contingency in their contract for his not playing, let alone not even saying hi.
If you are AT&T,[T
Loading...
()
] you are mortified to learn this as well as the fact that only five of the world's top 20 entered in the invitational.
But it's really a "What Can You Do?" situation. The way things work today, the power is with the athlete. Tiger isn't going to guarantee he's playing in a tournament or face a financial penalty and neither are other players.
But it's an interesting dilemma. Given the cost of things, at what point should sponsors, or ticket holders for that matter, be able to get some compensation for a lesser expectation? At what point does is the subject to change line after the asterisk just not acceptable?
My view? Though understandable this time, it's not acceptable for AT&T--whose stock is down about 20 percent--that Tiger isn't even at the tournament. But I don't think the ticketholders of the tournament--who paid the extremely affordable $30 for a weekday ticket, $35 for a weekend ticket and $100 for the whole tournament--have any sort of case.
Questions? Comments?










