FEATURED SLIDESHOW
Who Is The Worst CEO?Mad Money needed new inductees for its
Wall of Shame, so we asked viewers for
nominations.
RECENT POSTS
- Lightning Round: Toyota, Ford, Colgate-Palmolive and More
- Lightning Round OT: Hudson City Bancorp, Duke Energy and More
- Is This the Next 3Com?
- John Mack: Hero of the Credit Crisis?
- Cramer: Buy This New Gold ETF
- Cramer Tackles Toll Brothers Report
- Lightning Round: Priceline.com, Citigroup, Transocean and More
- Lightning Round OT: STEC, ICICI Bank and More
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott
MAD MONEY FEATURES
PODCASTSWatch the Lightning Round whenever and wherever you want.
OFFICIAL MAD MONEY WIDGETGrab this all-in-one application and get recaps of the show sent right to your desktop or blog.
CRAMERS SOUNDBOARDAdmit it: You've always wanted to hit the "They
know nothing!" button. Here’s your chance.
CHECK OUT OUR PHOTOSCheck out Cramer on set, back to school, behind the scenes and more.
SHOP FOR MAD MERCHANDISEBuy Cramer books, bobbleheads and other Mad Money merchandise.
RING TONESPick up the phone! It's Cramer! New Mad Money sounds for your cell phone.
TEXT MESSAGE ALERTMad Money's mobile. Get show highlights sent to your phone.
Text Size 
The perceived downside risk of stocks often sends those planning for retirement running to the safety that bonds provide.
The problem with that strategy, though, is that building an adequate nest egg is a race against time. Bonds just don’t generate enough money to cover the cost of living once your work days are done. That 4% return barely outpaces inflation.
The same goes for vehicles like stable-value funds. As Cramer said, they offer slightly better returns than money-market funds and slightly worse returns than a high-quality bond fund.
Cramer wasn’t saying that bonds have no place in a portfolio. But stocks come first. His suggestion: Buy a cheap S&P 500 index fund. It’s usually a good proxy for the market’s high-quality stocks.
Here’s Cramer’s retirement-planning breakdown for bond ownership:
- He sees no reason to own bonds during your 20s
- In your 30s, 10%-20% of a retirement portfolio can be in bonds
- The number climbs to 20%-30% in your 40s
- 30%-40% in your 50s
- from age 60 until retirement, bonds should be 40%-50% of your portfolio
Even in retirement, though, you should still own stocks, Cramer said. We’re living a lot longer these days, and not owning stocks is a bet against your own longevity.
Questions for Cramer?
Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes