ABOUT CNBC GUEST BLOG
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Busch: It Ain't All Bad News
- Keith Bergelt: The Case for Market Based Patent Reform
- Farrell: Digging Into Those Jobs Numbers
- Schork Oil Outlook: Are Gas Retailers Ready to Roll Back Prices?
- Hirschhorn: Steroids & Hedge Funds
- Farr: Time to Remove the Training Wheels?
- Roginsky: It’s (Still) Change, Stupid
- Schork Oil Outlook: Is Consumer Appetite for Gasoline Waning?
- Crescenzi: Fed Conditions Its Commitment on Rates
MOST SHARED
- Solar Market Heating Back Up?
- Realty Execs See Pain Ahead
- Want the Homebuyer's Tax Credit? Here Are Some Tips
- Tommy Lee, Medical Tourism and Nasty Santa, Your Emails
- Keith Bergelt: The Case for Market Based Patent Reform
- Oil Next Week
- Buying Fear: How to Own Volatility
- Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Says Net Income Tripled
- Can't Find a Job in Your Town? Here Are the Best Places to Look
- Maria's Market Message
- Tommy Lee, Medical Tourism and Nasty Santa, Your Emails
- U.S. Markets Gain 3% for the Week Despite 10.2% Unemployment
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Rockwell Automation Earnings: What Options Are Saying
- Gold Will Touch Higher Lows and Higher Highs: Analyst
- Is Misery Alive And Well in Your Office?
- Consumers Haven't Changed, They Are Just Pickier
- Watch Foreclosures, Seriously
- Outlook: Dollar Likely to Ride Higher on Bleak Jobs Report
- Holiday Airfare Close to Last Year's and Climbing
- Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Says Net Income Tripled
- Cramer: Earnings, IPOs Dominate Next Week
- Buying Fear: How to Own Volatility
- Administration Rejects Plan to Buy Fannie Mae Credits
- Consumers Haven't Changed —They Just Got Pickier
- Want the Homebuyer's Tax Credit? Here Are Some Tips
- Fears of Bubble Prompt Investors to Seek Exit Strategy
RSS FEED
CNBC Guest Blog
Text Size 
As I write this, I sit here in Western Pennsylvania, atop the Marcellus Oil Shale Deposit, which may become one of the largest sources of natural gas in the world.
The CEO of its development company recently told Larry Kudlow that things were going pretty quickly for him because most of the land above the deposit is privately owned. Negotiating with private owners, he said, who have an incentive to negotiate mineral rights, works a lot better than negotiating with governments. (See the video)
Some western states are almost all government owned, and the resources of those states remains buried in the ground. Not so with Pennsylvania, which is historically a farming state. That’s why the world’s first commercial oil well was sunk not far from here, in Titusville, on what previously been a farm.
Why did it start here, and not in the middle east or South America? Because they didn’t have Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence which we celebrate today, fought for the powerful idea that the right to private property included what’s under the surface of the ground as well as what is above it.
The old-world model was that the mineral rights belonged to the king. Frederick Barbarossa, the Holy Roman Emperor, held that coal and iron discovered on a freeman’s property could be taken by the state - without compensation. Not surprisingly, farmers went to great trouble not to find subterranean resources, and to hide any they’d uncovered. This model traveled west with the conquistadors and became the legal order of the Spanish colonies in Central and South America. It’s why Hugo Chavez and not some entrepreneur controls the vast oil reserves of Venezuela. It’s why Mexico’s oil company is state, not private-owned.
However, Jefferson announced a Novus Ordo Seclorum. This translates as “new order of the ages”, not as certain right wing conspiracy cranks claim “new world order”. It means that the old legal order of the divine right of kings would give way to a new order of "all men are created equal."
We have in recent decades drifted backwards, a little, to the old world. Central planning environmentalists cordon off great swaths of energy-rich property from the use of any consumers except a few disproportionately wealthy eco-tourists. They describe this act of putting resources under the control of the state as “progressive”. But they are wrong, it’s not progress, it’s a regression to the pre-American, pre-Jeffersonian privileges of the crown. The natural resources are being held for the good of the few, not for the good of the many.
What are other CNBC.com guest commentators saying?
________________________
 |
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes