SPECIAL REPORT

Healthy Horizons
A brand new series of weekly segments which will explore the macro and micro issues facing the global economy.

LATEST FROM OUR BLOGS

» More

- Why You Should Play the Reflation Trade: Stock Picker

MORE HEADLINES

» Markets | Economy | Companies

- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head

PHARMA'S MARKET VIDEO

» More

Sebelius on Vaccines

24 Nov 2009

Discussing whether a new $487M investment from the government will help speed up the production of the most important vaccines, with Kathy Sebelius, Health & Human Services secretary and CNBC's Mike Huckman.

The New Formula for Faster Vaccines

24 Nov 2009

Novartis is opening on Tuesday the country's first plant to produce flu vaccines using cell cultures. These vaccines are faster, better and cheaper to make than egg-based methods, reports CNBC's Mike Huckman.

Novartis Opens 1st US Plant for Flu Vaccine

24 Nov 2009

Cholesterol Drug Battle: Niaspan vs. Zetia 16 Nov 2009
Abbott Laboratories' Niaspan beat Merck's Zetia in a new study. CNBC's Mike Huckman has the details.

Cardiologist Grades Cholesterol Drug Study

16 Nov 2009

Abbott Laboratories' Niaspan beat Merck's Zetia in a new study. Dr. Steven Nissen, chairman of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at The Cleveland Clinic, shares his reaction with CNBC's Mike Huckman.

Merck's Cholesterol Drugs Under Pressure

16 Nov 2009

A new study is putting Merck's cholesterol drugs under pressure today, reports CNBC's Mike Huckman, with Ken Frazier, Merck Global Human Health president.

RSS FEED

» Help

Subscribe to this RSS feed
Stay up to date with Pharma's Market.

CNBC ON DIGG

Pharma's Market

Text Size

Jul.09

11:19 AM ET

Wednesday, 9 Jul 2008

Big Pharma Stocks: Real Rally Or One Day Wonder?

Posted By:Mike Huckman

Sectors:Health Care Equipment and Services | Health Care | Pharmaceuticals

Companies:Eli Lilly and Company | Genentech, Inc. | Merck & Co Inc | Pfizer Inc

Pharma Stocks
One day does not a full-fledged sector rotation make, but yesterday the big pharma stocks put on a show and in the early going today the curtain hasn't fallen.

Pfizer [PFE Loading... () ]even broke above 18 bucks!

The Amex Pharmaceutical Index jumped 3.3% which, according to our resident expert statistician Robert Hum, is the biggest one-day percentage gain in more than four years. May 5th, 2004, he says, was the last time the sector went up by at least that much in a single trading day. I'm not going to focus on them in this post, but biotechs also rallied on Tuesday. Genentech [DNA Loading... () ]kicks off that sector's earnings season after the closing bell next Monday.

Some of the big pharma stocks have been trading around multi-year lows (i.e. a decade or more), so perhaps they were overdue for a bounce. But does it signal a bottom? Who knows? Certainly, I'm in no position to make that call, but take the poll and see what others think.

The industry's issues are well-documented:Tens of billions of dollars worth of brand-name drugs lose their patents over the next five years, generally speaking there isn't enough in their drug development pipelines to replace those blockbuster products, a more cautious regulatory environment and the specter of a Democrat-controlled Washington has been scaring off investors.

In a research note to clients yesterday Goldman Sachs analyst Randall Stanicky wrote that the so-called "patent cliff" will peak in 2012 when an estimated $25 billion worth of prescription drugs will go generic. $25 billion worth in one year. And regarding the fear about the Dems putting the clamps on the industry, it's worth pointing out the latest campaign contribution figures from www.opensecrets.org.

As of June 30th, the Center for Responsive Politics, says the "Pharmaceuticals/Health Products" industry has given Sen. Barack Obama more than three-quarters of a million dollars so far. He's the top recipient of drug sector money among the entire original field of presidential candidates. Senator John McCain is a distant fourth with $292,000 from pharma/health products.

Cowen's "Elan" For Elan

And while we're on the topic of drug development challenges, the Food and Drug Administration this morning is announcing a change to some of its regulatory terminology that has sometimes caused a good deal of confusion. The agency is abandoning the use of "approvable" and "not approvable" letters. As I've blogged many times before, approvable has essentially become a euphemism for delay.

But people--including some in this newsroom--hear the word "approvable" and assume it's a win because it's so close to "approval." So, starting on August 11th, the FDA will issue "Complete Response" instead of "approvable" or "not approvable" letters. The CRL, which is already used for biotech drugs, will spell out for companies what they need to do to possibly win approval down the road or why they're not ever gonna win approval. But that doesn't necessarily mean the agency or the companies will publicly divulge that information. Some companies release the details, many do not, presumably for competitive reasons. But that leaves analysts and investors to guestimate what the problem(s) might be and how long it might take to clear it (them) up.

Dr. Janet Woodcock, the head of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, is quoted in the press release as saying the change will offer "a more consistent and neutral way of conveying information to a company when we cannot approve a drug application in its present form." In a recent meeting with FDA Commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach he told me he's on a mission "to improve speed and efficiency" at the agency. They're upgrading their labs, IT infrastructure and hiring a bunch of people. But he added that the quality of a company's drug approval application is the key factor in determining the timeline.

In the past couple of weeks the agency put the brakes on two items it had fast-tracked--a new bloodthinner from Eli Lilly [LLY Loading... () ]and Merck's[MRK Loading... () ] cervical cancer vaccine, Gardasil, for older women.