Tech Check
MOST SHARED
- Zero China Growth Is ‘Probable’: Gordon Chang
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Senate Summons Dimon to 'Get to the Bottom' of JPM Mess
- Romney Leads Poll Of Small Business Owners
- What College Tuition Will Look Like in 18 Years
- China Growth Risks Signal Need for Fiscal Action
- Bacon Tourism: From the Davos of Bacon to Bacon Mecca
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- Spain to Inject Emergency 19 Billion Euros into Bankia
- EU Set to Launch Action Against China Over Telecom Aid
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- Marc Faber: Chance of Global Recession Is Now 100%
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- Cool Jobs: From Gold Stacker to Bed Tester
- Sticker Shock: What College Is Likely to Cost in 18 Years
RSS FEED
AMD Is Fighting For Its Life
Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
![]() |
AP |
Its chief rival, Intel Corp.,[INTC
Loading...
()
] creates AMD's[AMD
Loading...
()
] entire market cap every three weeks or so.
We make so much of the rivalry between the two, but AMD is quickly becoming an asterisk in the broader market, and the company's chief executive, Hector Ruiz, continues to hold power.
You just have to wonder for how long. This was a $16 stock a year ago; $23 a share a year before that. This slide has been consistent, precipitous, and there's no end in sight for these shares to turn around.
The latest bit of devastating news for AMD comes from the animated studio DreamWorks[
Loading...
()
], the folks behind "Kung Fu Panda," "Shrek," and so many other animated hits, deciding on new chips from Intel to help the studio along with its 3D animation efforts, rather than continuing its relationship with AMD. AMD and DreamWorks have partnered since 2005 and was a lucrative deal for AMD: DreamWorks boasts 1,000 workstations and 1,500 servers.
Last year, I focused on AMD and its initiatives in Hollywood, partnering with major studios, including Lucas Film, because of the speed and price of its server and desktop chips. In fact, AMD spotlighted its relationship with Hollywood as a great example of the kinds of innovations its microprocessors could fuel in the right hands. A way to give consumers and companies a glimpse at what's possible with technology from AMD. Animated movies already use enormous computing power, but the 3D aspect of movie-making requires twice even that level of computing. Distressing for AMD is the message this news sends: that AMD chips were acceptable, to a point; but that now that films are getting more complicated, and need even more power, DreamWorks decided to go elsewhere.
AMD might be running out of options. The company has already sold an 8.1 percent chunk of itself to the Abu Dhabi government last September, but with a dramatically shrinking cap-ex budget, AMD appears unable to spend its way out of this mess. Some will say that AMD's problems stemmed from its acquisition of graphics chip maker ATI Technologies a couple of years ago for what was then thought to be a heavily inflated $5.4 billion. AMD had enormous trouble trying to digest that deal and now its value almost twice AMD's dwindling market cap. Ouch.
This is a company literally fighting for its life, and it needs to survive. Consumers, business customers, the marketplace as a whole need this company to survive. Intel is a well-oiled, money-making machine, but as the only game in town, it runs the risk of being a monopolist in more than just "name only." AMD has made the argument, sometimes compelling, sometimes not, that Intel has spent decades exercising that monopoly power.
There may be some fire under all that smoke, but in the meantime the industry still has two competitors. If Ruiz and team can't figure out a way to strengthen AMD, after so much time trying, they should step aside and make way for a team that can. More is at stake here than merely the survival of AMD as a company; chip industry competition depends on it.
AMD reports earnings a week from today. Two days after Intel.
Questions? Comments?










