- An Interview with Tom Coburn
- President Zero Sum Goes to Asia
- Is Government-Run Health Care Going to Pass?
- The Congressional Assault on Fed Independence
- Addicted to Easy Money?
- A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare
- A Short-Sighted Cheer for Easy Money
- Stocks and Voters Show GOP the Way
SHOW TIMES
Weeknights 7p ET
CNBC Asia:
Saturday 06:00 SIN/HK
Sunday 04:00 SIN/HK
CNBC Europe:
Monday - Friday 10:00 CET
Saturday 06:00 CET
Sunday 04:00 CET
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- China Eastern to Complete Shanghai Air Buy by End '09
- The Social Media Gaming Threat
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- JAL Slides to Record Low on Bankruptcy Jitters
- Prepare For Large Decline In Stocks, Next Year?
- Gold Will Collapse Like Oil Did in 2008: Charts
- Lyondell Urged to Consider Reliance Takeover Offer
CONTACT US
We want To hear from you!
E-mail:
Text Size 
Yesterday I wrote that the McCain campaign is distancing itself and moving away from cap-and-trade. This is clear from the fact that the senator’s recent speeches do not mention cap-and-trade, and that the 15-page policy pamphlet issued by the campaign also makes no mention of cap-and-trade.
After several responses to my piece shot through the blogosphere yesterday, Jill Hazelbaker, McCain’s communications director, issued a statement saying that any notion that the senator is abandoning or minimizing his support for cap-and-trade is “totally false.”
Well, as far as abandoning, that’s not what I said. I wrote that a McCain presidency might resurrect cap-and-trade, although it will be a much different format. But the key point is that several campaign advisors told me that the issue now is jobs and the economy, and of course $4 gas at the pump and $140 oil in the world market. Since cap-and-trade would not only establish the biggest government regulatory plan in history, and also would substantially raise gas and other fuel prices, the idea is a loser right now as every opinion-poll survey clearly shows.
Hence, the senator is being smart to move away from cap-and-trade and instead support drill, drill, drill for more energy supplies to reduce gas prices, as well as tax-cut plans to spur economic growth and jobs.
Mr. McCain is also correct to link drill, drill, drill with new energy-related job creation. In my formulation of this, nuclear power and clean coal are part of drill, drill, drill, as are natural gas and even alternative fuels. Last night former-Sen. Phil Gramm, who is ostensibly McCain’s most senior economic advisor, said as much on our program.
So while Ms. Hazelbaker may say that minimizing cap-and-trade support is totally false, she is engaging in a certain degree of cognitive dissonance on this subject. And let me note that the intent of my piece yesterday was to praise Mr. McCain on this topic, not to bury him.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes