LIVE QUOTE |
Quotes delayed 15+ min. |
- Tuesday's Heavy Dose of Data to Dictate 'Risk' Behavior
- Obama says Boosting US Jobs is Top Priority
- More Consumers Giving 'Black Friday' the Cold Shoulder
- Prepare For Large Decline In Stocks, Next Year?
- Appeals Court Denies Microsoft's Alcatel Petition
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Cramer: What Monday’s Housing Number Really Means
- Why the Dollar Will Likely Stay Weak for Some Time
- US Officials Press Pay Czar to Ease AIG Curbs: Report
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- HP's Mark Hurd
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- 9 Stocks That Play Rising Water Costs: Strategists
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Gold Prices Can Double in 3 Years: Portfolio Manager
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Strong banks, weak credit: Treasury rethinks TARP
- SKorean trade chief urges US to move on agreement
- Singapore tourism falls slightly in October
- China Eastern Airlines teams up with Alibaba
- China planning agency OKs Shanghai Disney project
- Poll: Americans conflicted over health overhaul
- Clothing sales down Nov., but online roars back
- SKorea pledges to double aid to Africa
- Kinder Morgan expects to pay $4.40 annual dividend
NEW YORK - EBay Inc. scored an important victory in court Monday, as a federal judge said companies such as jeweler Tiffany & Co. are responsible for policing their trademarks online, not auction platforms like eBay.
Tiffany had sued eBay in 2004, arguing that most items listed for sale as genuine Tiffany products on eBay's sites were fakes.
But U.S. District Judge Richard J. Sullivan in New York ruled that eBay can't be held liable for trademark infringement "based solely on their generalized knowledge that trademark infringement might be occurring on their Web sites."
The judge said that when Tiffany notified eBay of suspected counterfeit goods, eBay "immediately removed those listings." Although the online auction company refused to go further, by preemptively taking down suspicious listings for Tiffany jewelry, the judge said eBay didn't have to make such a move.
EBay spokeswoman Nichola Sharpe said Monday that the ruling "confirms that that eBay acted reasonably and has adequate procedures in place to effectively address counterfeiting."
Mark Aaron, a spokesman for Tiffany, said the company was "shocked and deeply dismayed" by the decision. Tiffany lawyer James Swire said his company might appeal it. Swire said eBay should be responsible for counterfeits on its sites, or else sellers of fakes could "go on victimizing consumers."
'Brand owners have to be vigilant'
The Tiffany ruling was a welcome twist for eBay, which recently lost a different case stemming from counterfeit luxury goods. Last month, a French court ordered eBay to pay more than $61 million to LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA, which complained it was hurt by sale of knockoff bags, perfume and clothes. EBay is appealing that ruling.
EBay says it spends tens of millions each year to combat counterfeiting. It runs a program that lets companies review listings and inform eBay of those they believe are for fake goods; eBay removes ones that participants flag. The company also suspends and blocks users who have been found selling or are suspected of selling fake goods on eBay.
EBay says that in 2007, 50,000 sellers were thrown out over counterfeits, with 40,000 previously suspended sellers blocked from returning.
Anthony LoCicero, a lawyer at New York firm Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein who specializes in trademark and patent law, called the decision "tremendously important" for eBay and commerce on the Internet.
"Brand owners have to be vigilant," he said. "That's the message."
If the case had gone the other way, it could have made it much harder for people to legitimately buy and sell used — but trademarked — goods, said Wendy Seltzer, a fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society.
"If eBay had to preemptively examine the trademark status of every item that were posted — is it genuine, is it counterfeit — it would be much more expensive to put a listing on eBay because it would be much more expensive for eBay to process and host this listing," she said.
Separately, the judge said eBay could use the Tiffany name in its ads, both on its home page and in sponsored links eBay buys through the search engines run by Yahoo Inc. and Google Inc. That has been an unsettled legal question for search engines, which have faced lawsuits over the use of trademarked terms in paid search listings.
EBay shares fell 33 cents, 1.2 percent, to $27.68 in late afternoon trading, while Tiffany shares rose 51 cents, 1.4 percent, to $37.50.
- The show attracts a big TV audience every year, but this year it may take on even more importance.
- …you'll want to be prepared. Tips for getting the most out of the post-Thanksgiving shopping frenzy.
- Congressman Ron Paul explains to Squawk Box why he’s pushing legislation to audit the Federal Reserve.
- CNBC’s Phil LeBeau took a test drive of GM’s flagship electric car. Here’s what he thought of the Volt.
- The energy company Power Efficiency is building tools that regulate the power electric motors use.
- CNBC’s technology reporter Jim Goldman guides you through the best gadgets to buy this holiday season.








