![]()
- Bonus Bloodbath: Europe Banker Backlash Continues
- Stocks Looking Past Europe for a New Driver of the Rally
- Israel Likely to Bomb Iran This Year: Political Analyst
- Greeks on Strike as the Second Bailout Is in Limbo
- EU Agrees Rules for $700 Trillion Derivatives Market
- The World's Best Beers
- Citigroup Takes $50 Million Loss in Lending Rate Probe
- Barclays Warns May Miss Medium-Term Profit Goal
- Will Romney Regret Opposing Michigan Auto Bailout?
- Tesla Unveils First SUV: Model X
- New York Fashion Week Hits the Runway as Colors Pop
- Mulling Buffett's Stock Advice? Get in With REITs: Fund Managers
- LinkedIn Earnings Bode Well for Hiring and Social Media
- Top Five Mistakes to Avoid in Online Dating
- Victor Cruz ‘Understands’ Gisele's Super Bowl Frustrations
- Tamminen: The United States of India
- Unusual Volume: Taleo Jumps After Oracle's $1.9 Billion Offer
- Warren Buffett: Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds .. and They're Safer 'By Far'
MOST POPULAR
HOT ON FACEBOOK
Put Fannie, Freddie into Federal Receivership: WSJ
The U.S. Treasury Secretary could make greater progress toward a safer financial system by putting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into federal receivership, the Wall Street Journal said on Tuesday.
If the current law doesn't give Henry Paulson that power, he should seek it from Congress, the newspaper said in an editorial on its website.
The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve on Sunday offered massive aid to bolster confidence in the companies and head off a potential financial market meltdown.
Together, the country's two biggest mortgage firms finance about $5 trillion in U.S. home loans, or about half of the total, so are too big to fail, the Wall Street Journal said.
"The question has been how to manage and regulate these monsters in a way that minimizes risks to the larger financial system and taxpayer," the editorial said.
Paulson wants Congress to give the government more power to rein in the two companies, including with a capital injection of preferred stock if required.
"This is progress, but it's not aggressive enough given the risks. He could make more progress more rapidly toward a safer financial system by putting the companies in federal receivership," the newspaper said.
Paulson could then appoint a prominent financial figure with bipartisan credibility as a receivership czar, with a mission to protect taxpayer interests.
A czar would have the power to replace the companies' management and directors, as well as give priority to taxpayers above the current private shareholders if the government does inject capital, the newspaper said.
Receivership does not mean the companies will fold overnight.
They continue to hold trillions of dollars in mortgage assets, and they would continue to buy and package mortgages, the paper said.
But as a first priority, a receiver would be able to rein in their portfolios of mortgage-backed securities -- currently about $1.5 trillion -- that are a major source of their risk.
Later, as the mortgage crisis eases, the receiver could decide whether to wind the companies down, sell them in parts to the private sector, or let them continue in far more restricted form, the paper said.
The receivership option would also help Paulson get out ahead of the many other looming financial problems.
Airline and car companies' failure may come in the future, the paper said.
Putting Fannie [FNM
Loading...
()
] and Freddie [FRE
Loading...
()
] in firmer hands now will reassure investors that at least one risk is being well managed, reducing public fear that the government is overwhelmed, the paper said.
- How much did the Facebook founder pay for other shareholders' voting rights? Not a heck of a lot, says the NY Times.
- Here’s a look at Westminster Kennel Club’s most successful breeds and how much they cost.
- The oft-mentioned jobs "miracle" in European economic powerhouse Germany has a dark side that's largely escaped comment.
- When looking for that next career move, workers need to look at the differences between a start-up and a public firm.
- After enduring the recession, many Baby Boomers say money isn’t the most important thing they hope to leave to their kids.
- The ‘Fast Money’ traders weigh in on fashion related stocks from apparel to footwear to accessories and fragrances.










