More Videos
- Tiger Woods Wants to Protect Family Privacy: Agent
- Is Super Bowl Halftime Act Too Old?
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
- NBA D-League On The Rise
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Boise State Stock Plan: An Early Success
- Dollar Signs Seen In Young "Buck" Jennings
- Iverson Wasn't A Popular "Answer"
- My Top 10 Marketing Ideas For Winless Nets
RSS FEED
- Portfolio Prep for Next Week: 'Don't Get Crazy'
- U.S. Stocks Fall on Dubai Worries
- Black Friday at Best Buy
- Strategists on Dubai: Avoid 'Rash Moves' Now
- Longer Lines, Fuller Carts This Black Friday
- Dubai Stock Market Fear Has 'Legs': Dennis Gartman
- Obama's Emission Reduction Pledge Paints Future for Autos
- Is Super Bowl Halftime Act Too Old?
- Surprising Options Trades in TiVo Shares
- US Shoppers Spent Less Over Black Friday: NRF
- UAE Central Bank Stands by Banks Amid Dubai Crisis
- UAE Markets Seen Limit Down on Monday Open
- Banks With The Biggest Exposure to The UAE
- Dubai's Debt Woes Signal New Era for Creditors
- A Weak IPO Debut for Las Vegas Sands' Macau Unit
- US Treasury Wants Banks to Do More to Ease Mortgages
- Tiger Woods Accepts Full Blame for Car Crash
- Next Week: Cash In Now Or Wait For A Santa Rally?
Sports Biz
Text Size 
 |
There were a lot of cheers in Chicago yesterday when Cubs fans heard that Mark Cuban was still in the running for the next Cubs owner.
And many in the industry were shocked that John Canning, the favorite, reportedly provided too weak of a bid to make the second round.
It has been reported that Cuban is now the top bidder at $1.3 billion. I don’t believe a fiscally minded Cuban is willing to pay that much for the Cubs, Wrigley and the stake in Comcast [CMCSA
Loading...
()
]. (There’s only so much money in a sold out Wrigley and the fact that the Tribune owns WGN will stop the new owner from starting a full-fledged Cubs network.)
But I think that even if Cuban is not the highest bidder, he should be strongly considered because of his record as an owner. It’s not really a home run that someone who spends $1 billion on a team is going to automatically care about winning – especially the Cubs, who can easily sell out every game. But we know that Cuban does.
In the eight years before Cuban bought the Mavericks, the team was 189-435 (29 percent winning percentage) in the regular season. In Cuban’s eight full years owning the team, they’re 500-235 (68 percent), including their eight straight playoff appearances. Only the Spurs have a longer active streak of 50-win seasons (9 to the Mavericks’ 8).
So why does Tribune [TRB
Loading...
()
] owner Sam Zell care? Because remember, Zell would still own the Chicago Tribune and WGN, which will broadcast about 45 percent of the Cubs games this year. And while I’m not sure that the Cubs winning would really sell that many more papers, there’s definitely a direct connection between the Cubs winning and ratings on WGN. That means there’s literally tens of millions of dollars in advertising at stake between a great Cubs team and a horrible Cubs team.
With the Cubs winning this year, in a bid to win the World Series for the first time in a century, Cubs broadcasts on Comcast SportsNet were up more than 50 percent in the first half of the baseball season. WGN experienced a rise of almost 30 percent.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes