RSS FEED
- Radio Rounds: A Job Loss and Education
- A Big Net Deal: Getting Staff's Attention
- Site Hot Links? Fear and Greed
- Balloon Boy: Not Your Average Business Story
- Hot Items: Gold, Gifts and Gritty Prison Fights
- Hot Links for Monday
- Swine Flu By Any Other Name ... Like H1N1
- Gnashing Teeth at the Typo
- Responding to Readers on What's Clicking
MOST SHARED
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- Apple Surpasses Nokia as Top Cellphone Maker by Profits
- Gold Heading to $1150: Art Hogan
- Adobe Cuts 680 Jobs, to Take Charge
- Toll Brothers: More Contracts Signed, but Sales Down
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott
- US Becomes Top Country Brand Under Obama: Survey
- Starbucks Brews Up Growth
- Your First Move For Wednesday November 10th
- Lightning Round: Priceline.com, Citigroup, Transocean and More
- Web Extra: The Best Trades In Tech
- Lightning Round OT: STEC, ICICI Bank and More
- Pops & Drops: UPS, Electronic Arts...
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott
- Cramer: In This Relay-Race Market, Who Gets Baton Next?
- Take Your Position: Retail Earnings
- The Return of Dividend Investing?
Text Size 
I've found another one of those headline words guaranteed to scare readers away: Doha.
Knowledgeable business news readers know this refers to the world trade talks underway since 2001. Others may think it is something to do with Homer Simpson. Unfortunately for us business editor types, the latter would probably get more reader action.
Sure the world trade talks, which just crumpled for the umpteenth time, are very, very important. Global trade is one of those macro-economic things that touches everyone in one way or another. A farmer or factory worker suddenly faces overseas competition that puts them out of a job. Consumers suddenly find lower prices and more choices. Trade rattles all the way down the food chain and can be good or bad, depending on your point of view.
Something business news readers should stay on top of, no?
But readers hate it. At least that's what my traffic meters tell me. Why? Well, it's theoretical and pretty far from the here and now. Not like stories of people trying to get money out of failing banks or gas prices suddenly swinging by a dollar. Also, the trade discussions are handled by full-blown, bureaucratic diplomats. Their messages to one another may be full of nuanced meaning ... but their diplo-speak rarely makes riveting news copy.
And like I said, these talks have been off, on, off, on .... gets a little boring after a while. Just as bad as Libor.
Now some types of trade stories get some traction, mind you. A boycott, tainted imports, even the occasional wildly unexpected trade gap figure can all pull some readers. But Doha? Nah ... even though a lot of major newspapers have it plastered on their front page today.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes