MOST SHARED
- BlackRock: Central Banks To Be Net Buyers of Gold
- Gold Is in a 'Bubble' And Will Keep Going Higher: Gartman
- Weak US Housing Market Drags on Lowe's Profit
- CNBC Video: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping American Great
- Signs of Stability, but 'We're Not All Satisfied': GM CEO
- Taking a Page from Obama's Asia Agenda in Investing
- EADS Cautious on Full-Year Forecast after Earnings Dip
- Cisco Ups Tandberg Bid, Claims Over 40% Backing
- Devon to Sell its Gulf, International Assets
- Underwater Mortgages Could Sink Even Deeper
- My Market and Fed Outlook Now: BlackRock's Doll
- Farrell: The Market is Still Seeking Reassurance
- GM Cuts Losses—Plans Early Loan Repayment
- Schork Oil Outlook: Still Bearish Crude, But Skeptical
- Michelle Wie Wins, Now What?
- Taking a Page from Obama's Asia Agenda in Investing
- Warren Buffett to CNBC: 'I Haven't Bought American Express In Years'
- CNBC Video: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates - Keeping American Great
- Gold Is in a 'Bubble' And Will Keep Going Higher: Gartman
- Millions May Have to Repay Part of Obama Tax Credit
- Madoff Auction Raises $1 Million for Ponzi Victims
- Retail Sales Show Gain, But Manufacturing Gauge Slips
- Business Inventories Fall 0.4% in September
- Intel Plans to Increase Dividend 12.75%; Shares Gain
- Several Credit Card Companies See Default Rate Fall
- Fed Proposes Crackdown on Excessive Gift-Card Fees
- How Much Do You Know About Green?
RSS FEED
Funny Business
![]() |
I asked veteran defense analyst Cai von Rumohr of Cowen and Company if he thinks the story could be true. Von Rumohr says he thinks the chances are "pretty good" that Boeing is truly considering the threat, because the new Pentagon request from bidders contains two things--a tanker ready next year, and a larger aircraft--which are both "bad for Boeing."
If Boeing did, in fact, drop out, would Congress allow the Pentagon to move forward with only one bidder? "They would be very upset," von Rumohr says of defense officials. "Whether the Air Force decides to call Boeing's bluff we'll see."
Bluff? Von Rumohr says, "I think Boeing's strategy is probably likely to be to try to push this decision into the new year and a new administration...you know, if they think that they're for sure going to lose, why not go through with a bluff because it might work."
Why push into a new administration? Clearly a President Obama would favor organized labor and a Boeing tanker. It's possible a President McCain wouldn't want to be seen as dumping on Boeing a second time (McCain is a major reason the original deal to lease tankers from Boeing never happened). Also, the longer this thing drags out, perhaps the greater the chances Boeing could put together a proposal for a tanker based on its larger 777, even though the company has said it has no plans to change planes. But the 777 would be a larger, more "apples to apples" comparison to the proposed Northrop Grumman [NOC
Loading...
()
]tanker.
On that note, Northrop Grumman tells me it is also meeting with Pentagon officials tomorrow. Spokesman Randy Belote adds that the new request from the Pentagon, "clarifies BUT DOES NOT ALTER the original tanker requirements or alter the tanker specifications. This is key and rebuffs Boeing's supporters calling for a delay in the program.
During the initial competition, each competitor was free to bid whatever tanker it felt would best meet the Air Force's requirements. And we are free to do that again, of course, within the scope of this amended acquisition process." True, but changing horses, or airplanes, at this late date would be extremely difficult for Boeing, given the Pentagon's timeline.
Bottom line, when I asked von Rumohr what he thinks will happen with the tanker deal, he shook his head and laughed, saying "I have no idea."
Video: Boeing is considering bowing out of the Air Force tanker competition.
Questions? Comments? Funny Stories? Email









