- My ESP: Sports Clubs Take On Airline Pricing
- Marisa Miller's Weapon: Brain Behind the Body
- Update: Credence To 'Seminole Firewater'
- Sponsors Paying For Your Fight
- Ok, What's All This About FSU "Inventing" Gatorade?
- Charlie Weis And Notre Dame: Where's the Anger At His Agent?
- Sweetening The Pot: Where Are You, Chris Vennum?
- Cavs Owner Doesn't Mind Buzz Over James
- Plaxico Burress: Will Gunshot Incident Affect His Jersey Sales?
- Black Friday Comes Up A Winner For Sports Leagues
- Cramer to Geithner: Let FDIC Chair Keep Her Job
- Lightning Round: Boeing, Medtronic, Agrium and More
- Lightning Round OT: Continental, Amylin Pharma and More
- Sell Block: Cramer's Solution for Mortgage-Backed Paper Mess
- Toll Brothers CEO's Housing Outlook
- Making Money Off M&A
- Your First Move For Friday December 5th
- Web Extra: Fast & Furious Trades For Friday
- Bear Market Boot Camp, Pt. 2
- Asian Markets Wobble on Gloomy Economic Outlook
- Honda Plans to Pull Out of Formula One
- Job Cuts Picking Up Steam Just in Time for Holidays
- Pros Say: Bear Market Rallies = New Reality
- CEOs Sound Off: Budget Deficit, Bailouts & More
- Bernanke: 'More Needs To Be Done' on Foreclosures
- Bernanke's Speech on Housing and Foreclosures
- With Saturn, G.M. Failed a Makeover
- Toll Loss Narrows, but Warns on Revenue

![]() |
CNBC.com Jacques Rogge |
That's because, according to a new rule unilaterally imposed on the athletes by the International Olympic Committee, the Olympic Games period actually is defined as taking place from Aug. 1 to Aug. 27.
That's relevant because, according to the Olympic Charter Rule 41, athletes cannot appear on advertising of non-Olympic sponsors during what is defined as that games period.
CNBC has learned that before these games, the games period was defined as ranging from the Opening to the Closing Ceremonies. But in late October, the IOC sent a letter stating that, for the Beijing Games, that period would begin eight days before the games and end three days after the closing ceremony.
Agents of those Olympic athletes who just won marketable gold medals are not happy with this ruling. Some claim they never received any of this communication. Others who have heard are concerned for their clients, who already have a very small window to cash in, especially with the NFL and college football set to start.
Many contend that the IOC -- which is imposing the rule to further protect its Olympic sponsors from ambush marketing -- doesn't have the legal right to stop athletes from signing deals as soon as the games are done. IOC officials have not said what the specific penalties they would impose, but if it's making an athlete ineligible retroactively, it could involve the stripping of medals.
"As to Rule 41, the Games period, as defined by the IOC, is clear," said USOC general counsel Rana Dershowitz. "The definition does not seem unreasonable to us as the purpose of the rule is to protect against non-Olympic sponsors trading off the excitement and value of the Games -- a benefit that is reserved for Olympic sponsors."
Dershowitz would not speculate on how an Olympian would be punished if the games period were violated.
--Liz Robbins contributed to this post.
_____________________________________
Questions? Comments?


