Skip navigation
Watchlist Sponsored By :

Current DateTime: 10:25:16 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24355697

FEATURED QUIZZES


Current DateTime: 10:25:16 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 33793611
  • The Billionaire BFF's

      Philanthropists. Bridge partners. Hockey players. Which responses are based on facts from Buffett's and Gates' real lives?

  • The Many Myths of Coca-Cola

      Can you tell which statements are true, and which ones are just rumors?

  • Think You Understand Markets?

      We've selected some questions from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's test of investor knowledge. See how you do ...


Current DateTime: 10:25:16 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24890560
  • Winterizing Your Portfolio

      If 2009 was the winter of our discontent, will 2010 be a winter wonderland for investors? A lot depends on the recovery—or lack thereof.

  • Investor's Guide to Real Estate

      Some even say the long-awaited recovery is here. Regardless, buyers and sellers alike can profit from our guide.

  • Alternative Investing

      Stocks and bonds? Sure. But it's a big world out there for investors.

powered by digg
Climate Consensus Obscures Obama, McCain Differences
By: Kenneth Stier, Features Writer | 25 Aug 2008 | 02:32 PM ET
Text Size

Both presidential candidates support the need to curb greenhouse gases believed to cause global warming, but there are key differences in how they would implement what will eventually be a significant overhaul of the country’s energy infrastructure.

White House
AP

First and foremost, the candidates agree on a market-based cap-and-trade program that will establish a price for carbon dioxide emissions that tightens over time, providing an incentive for businesses to develop cleaner energy technology.

The similarity, however, pretty much ends there, as Senators John McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee, and Barack Obama, the soon-to-be nominated Democratic candidate at the party's convention this week, differ on how aggressively to pursue this environmental goal and on exactly how to fund the transition.

More specifically, they differ on whether to make businesses pay for carbon pollution permits over a certain limit — some of which they would get back in government support to adopt cleaner technology — or give them a free ride initially, with sanctions pushed into the future.

“Between the two candidates, the devil's in the details,” notes Tufts economist Gilbert Metcalf.  “Obama wants to auction all the permits and use the revenue for energy efficiency, R&D and other purposes [while] McCain wants to give the bulk of the permits away initially — this is the $100 billion difference between the candidates.”

Your Money Your Vote

Environmentalists are concerned that, without the pressure of real costs, businesses will not move fast enough to reach critical emissions targets — 80 percent reduction by 2050 — while business complains it will be hit with a double-whammy of paying for pollution and curbing emissions.

But Vicki Arroyo, director of policy analysis at the nonpartisan Pew Center on Global Climate Change, calls this a “paper difference” that exaggerates what McCain and Obama are likely to actually try to implement.

“I don’t think anyone really thinks that 100 percent auction is politically viable,” she says, adding that the Obama campaign has accepted this reality because of strong business opposition and general economic concerns.

She says the new Congress' full agenda will prevent climate change legislation from being  passed “until 2010 at the earliest.”  Even that might come in smaller pieces, targeting specific sectors, such as utilities, which account for some 40 percent of carbon emissions. In either case, opposition from some quarters will be significant.

Biggest Impact on Utilities Industry

Within the power sector, companies most dependent on coal — the dirtiest fossil fuel — will be hit hardest, particularly if they are forced to buy permits for future emissions.

“This is an abysmal policy, this is a killer for coal states,” says John Stowell of Duke Energy, [DUK  Loading...      ()   ] one of the country’s largest utilities, about plans to make utilities pay for permission for future carbon emissions.

Obama has insisted all allowances to emit carbon be auctioned off, while McCain seems to favor giving away at least a portion of them.

The leading draft legislation on this issue, the Lieberman-Warner bill ( (S.2191 America's Climate Security Act 2008, co-sponsored by Senators John Warner and Joe Lieberman, which evolved from a tougher, earlier bill co-sponsored by McCain) calls for auctioning 25 percent of the permits.

That bill calls for reducing carbon emissions 50 percent by 2050, even though a large body of scientists say an 80-percent reduction will be needed to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change.

As a regulated utility, Duke would pass on these costs to customers. Indiana, for instance, would see electricity prices rise 65 percent within five years, the company estimates.  A study by the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Council of Capital Formation offer a state-by-state economic impact analysis of the Senate bill.

The new cost to carbon could force utilities to switch to natural gas, which emits half the carbon coal does, but this could force up electricity prices.

Tools:
Print EmailAdd This share icon
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • Warren Buffett and Bill Gates spoke to Columbia students, and Buffett made the students a startling offer.
  • Brian L. Roberts
  • For the chief of cable company Comcast, growth has been about making deals – generally very large deals.
  • Some companies may start using insurance to shift carbon risk from their balance sheets to maybe... yours?
  • The president and founder of Genesis Today wants to improve America’s health, and thinks Wal-Mart can help.
  • Switzerland's privacy watchdog is taking legal action to force Google to make changes to its Street View service.
  • A wealthy, distracted Texas driver crashed his million-dollar Bugatti Veyron sports car into a salt marsh, say police.
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:02:14 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:02:14 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 01:02:14 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:02:14 14 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters