- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- The View From Newark
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Fast Funds: Hot Ways To Play China
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Earnings 101: Beyond The Big Names
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
- GM IPO in Second Quarter 2010 at the Earliest: CFO

- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- It's Not the Wealthy Who Are Leaving California: Study
- Atlantic City Takes Hit as Pennsylvania Casino Opens
RSS FEED

![]() |
CNBC.com Jerry Seinfeld |
A few weeks ago, I detailed in a blog Microsoft's decision to use comedian Jerry Seinfeld as its new pitchman. I wrote then of the unusual choice of a professional complainer who hasn't done anything meaningful since his show Seinfeld went off the air a decade ago.
Sure, he's dabbled in a number of ventures since, done the "Bee Movie," a series of American Express [
Loading...
()
]commercials, and some stand-up as well, but largely, he has been living off the enormous residuals of his one good idea. Kinda like Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
]inventing Windows, I wrote then, and largely living off its monopoly revenue ever since.
Today, hypothetical gets real now that we get to see the first ad featuring Seinfeld. About 90 seconds long, and I stress "long," the commercial has Bill Gates shopping for shoes, Seinfeld seeing him in the store, and popping in to help out. It's quirky, awkward, mildly humorous (and I stress "mildly"), and, well, long!
The best part? Gates' "Big Top" frequent shopping card at the Shoe Circus, complete with geeky, childhood photo. That was funny, but no catch phrase, no clear message, no compelling story that holds your interest. As Seinfeld was walking through the mall, he should have at least been listening to some tunes on his Zune. No such luck. The churro was cute.
(Video: Microsoft Ad with Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates.)
Microsoft comes up woefully short on the "icon" meter.
Where Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
]offers a simple message that spotlights its superiority, Microsoft tries to offer kitsch. Where Apple offers "message," Microsoft puts forth mediocrity. Where Apple engenders emotion and humor, sprinkled with a dash of elitism and aspiration, Microsoft offers something that just falls flat.
Which is unfortunate. Apple has had its way with Microsoft since "I'm a Mac/I'm a PC" debuted. Bill Gates' commercial response suggests this emperor has no clothes. Hmmm. Maybe an underwear-clad Seinfeld wandering through a mall? Or Gates in boxers? Nah, that just isn't funny either.
Update: The photo on the Big Top frequent shopper card was actually more funny than I thought. Turns out it isn't a childhood photo, but a mug shot from Gates' arrest in New Mexico in 1977 stemming from a traffic violation. OK, now I'm liking this commercial a lot more. Thanks, Phillip Raso, for the heads-up!
Questions? Comments?







