- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Oprah to Leave Syndication in 2011
- Sony's E-Reader Shortage and the Digital Book Battle
- Salesforce.com Brings Facebook and Twitter's Social Capabilities to Businesses
- Sumner Redstone's Companies Face Off Yet Again
- Can YouTube Revolutionize Citizen Journalism?
- What MGM's Sale Could Say About Value of Content
- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Existing-Home Sales Jump To Highest Level in 2-1/2 Years
- Wall Street Finds Profits by Reducing Mortgages
- Start-Up Proves Everything Really Is Better With Bacon
- CNBC VIDEO: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' at Columbia University
- Kraft Weighs Higher Cadbury Bid as Rivals Circle
- China Asks Its Banks to Slow Down
- China Should Stop Property Stimulus Now: Central Bank
- China Industrial Bank Eyes $2.64 Billion Rights Issue
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
- HP to Feed on Enterprise Spending Next Year: Tech Analyst
- This Holiday Season—Little Joy For Those Hard Hit
- Busch: Markets Smell a Country Rat
- Schork Oil Outlook: Mission Impossible For The Bears?
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Losey: Asset Allocation At Retirement
- Farrell: Obama Hectored, Ignored and Restricted?
- Don't Dwell on Investment Mistakes; Move on, Like Buffett
- Existing-Home Sales Jump to 2-1/2 Year High
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- US Job Losses to Bottom out Next Quarter: NABE
- Obama Jobs Forum May Be More Political Than Practical
- Late Payments on Credit Cards Drop in Third Quarter
- Smallest US Businesses Borrowing Again: PayNet
- China Asks Its Banks to Slow Down Lending
- Little Sign of Inflation on the Horizon: IMF
- Suze Orman’s 'A Healthier, Wealthier You'
Media Money
![]() |
CNBC.com |
The Justice Department reportedly hired Sanford Litvack, a prominent anti-trust litigator to consult on its probe into Google[GOOG
Loading...
()
] and Yahoo's [YHOO
Loading...
()
]planned deal, a sign the government could be preparing to challenge the deal as anti-competitive. Litvack has quite the resume: he was the DOJ's antitrust chief under Jimmy Carter and Disney's former Vice Chairman. Most recently he was a partner at the law firm Hogan & Hartson, where he focused on antitrust and trade regulation cases, among other things. The DOJ won't comment on whether or not Litvack is now on their team, but he's now longer on Hogan & Hartson's website, and he's reportedly been asked to examine evidence on the Yahoo-Google deal.
That's not all, news of Litvack's hire follows a powerful advertising industry trade group coming out against the Yahoo Google deal. The Association of National Advertisers, which represents marketing powerhouses like General Motors,[GM
Loading...
()
] P&G,[PG
Loading...
()
] and Wal-Mart,[WMT
Loading...
()
] is appealing to the Justice Department to block this deal. I spoke to the president of the ANA, Bob Liocide, who pointed to the fact that a combined Yahoo-Google would influence over 90 percent of the search advertising market, which poses real concern to prices. Liodice says there's simply too great a risk that this deal would reduce competition and lead to higher prices and a lower return on investment to advertisers. This risk of course comes at a time when thanks to economic pressures, advertisers are pulling back their spend, and focusing much more on return on investment.
What happens now? Option one: the DOJ approves the deal and it goes forward as planned. Option two: the DOJ has some problems with the deal, approaches the two companies with their concerns, and they tweak the deal until a compromise is made. Or option three, the two companies proceed with their partnership without Justice Department approval, and then the government, if it has a problem with the deal, could potentially sue, as it did with the Microsoft anti-trust case.
Google and Yahoo say they see no problems with the deal. At the Allen & Co. conference in July Google CEO Eric Schmidt told me that because the Yahoo deal is for ads, and not search, and because it's non-exclusive, he doesn't foresee any anti-competitive issues.
The stakes are high, especially because this deal was used as a pawn in Microsoft's[MSFT
Loading...
()
] takeover play, so I'll be watching carefully to see how this works out.
Questions? Comments?









