- Stimulus Critics Put Obama, Democrats on Defensive
- Warren Buffett: Consumer Sales Remain 'Very, Very Soft'
- Busch: Chinese Bank Announces Bombshell
- Lenny Dykstra Claims 'Bank Fraud' Caused Bankruptcy
- Christmas in July: Consumers to Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon-Trading
- Video Game Makers Finding Gold in Old Titles
- The 15 Highest Grossing Movies of All Time
- Cerberus Won't Let Investors Out of Hedge Fund: Report
- July 10th in Market History
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Options Smell 'Blood' on Infosys
- Christmas in July: Consumers To Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- GM's Second Chance
- Art Cashin: Traders Weigh Obama Policy Changes
- Warren Buffett: Economy Needs Another Dose of Viagra
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Will LeBron Dunk Tape Ever Be Released?
- 99 Cents Only posts strong 1Q sales
- Allegheny Energy extends CEO's contract
- Delta announces venture with Virgin Blue
- FTC: Equifax unit TALX settles charges
- Arkansas lawmakers take look at tobacco settlement
- Guidelines for renewable energy funding released
- Shaw Group reports sharply lower fiscal 3Q profit
- Temp agency settles discrimination suit in Mass.
- Livestock groups denounce "cash-for-grass" offer
WASHINGTON - The chairman of the of Senate Judiciary Committee said Wednesday he believes more than one person was responsible for the the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks.
The FBI has said that Dr. Bruce Ivins, who committed suicide, was the sole suspect in the investigation into the anthrax-laced letters that killed five and sickened 17 in fall 2001.
At a hearing in front of his committee, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., told FBI Director Robert Mueller that he thinks other people must have been involved.
Leahy did not say why he believed the perpetrator had help and he also cast doubt that the Army scientist was the attacker in the first place.
"If he is the one who sent the letter, I do not believe in any way, shape or manner that he is the only person involved in this attack on Congress and the American people. I do not believe that at all," Leahy said.
He added: "I believe there are others involved, either as accessories before or accessories after the fact. I believe that there are others out there, I believe there are others who could be charged with murder. I just want you to know how I feel about it, as one of the people who was aimed at in the attack."
Mueller did not directly contradict Leahy, saying "I understand that concern."
Still, Mueller maintained the Justice Department's view that Ivins was the mastermind and sole attacker.
"In the investigation to date, we have looked at every lead and followed every lead to determine whether anybody else was involved, and we will continue to do so," Mueller told Leahy. "And even if the case does become closed, if we receive additional evidence, indicating the participation of any additional person, we certainly would pursue that."
FBI investigation closed
The Justice Department and FBI have yet to close the case on the "Amerithrax" investigation after declaring Ivins its only suspect last month. Ivins killed himself in July after learning that prosecutors were preparing to indict him.
Republicans shared Leahy's doubts surrounding the case.
Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the top GOP member of the panel, said he had problems with some of the evidence against Ivins that has been made public. In a testy exchange with Mueller, he also demanded to have a say in selecting scientists who will be performing an independent review of the DNA fingerprinting analysis of the anthrax that lies at the heart of the government's case.
The review by the National Academy of Sciences will be made up of private scientists who did not assist the FBI in the investigation, and could take up to 18 months to complete. Mueller said he would consider allowing the Judiciary Committee to suggest scientists, but noted that the NAS and Justice Department likely would have to agree to it.
"What's there to consider, Director Mueller?" Specter said. "We'd like to have the authority to name some people there to be sure of its objectivity. We're not interlopers here. This is an oversight matter. What's there to consider?"
Mueller said "to the extent that the rules of the science allow that to happen, I have no objection to that request."
"Well, that's not far enough," Specter snapped.
NAS spokesman William Kearney said the organization would "welcome input on potential committee members" from Congress, federal agencies, scientific community and the general public. Still, all suggestions must be approved by the NAS president, Kearney said.




