Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.91m | ▼ | 5.02m |
| New Home Sales | 460,000 | ▼ | 520,000 |
| Housing Starts | 817,000 | ▼ | 872,000 |
| Building Permits | 786,000 | ▼ | 857,000 |
| HMI | 14 | ▼ | 17 |
| Existing Home Prices | $203,100 | ▼ (annually) | $224,400 |
| New Home Prices | $221,900 | ▼ (annually) | $236,500 |
- Predictions: 9 For '09 In Real Estate
- For Manhattan, The Issue Is Now Those Maintenance Fees
- The $500 Billion Buy Up Of MBS: Is It Really Enough?
- FHA's New Risky Loans Make Housing Even Riskier
- Fear Gripping Commercial Real Estate—But Question Is Why?
- Reasons NOT To Modify Troubled Home Loans
- Bailout For Builders—Are They Next In Line?
- Homeowners: Not Just About Buying—It's Also About Investing
- Bailout Anger Boiling: "Is Kashkari A Chump?"
- That $300 Billion Hope For Homeowners Isn’t Working
- Cramer's Outrage: Paulson & Bernanke
- Lightning Round: Genzyme, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Steel and More
- Lightning Round OT: Verizon, Kroger, Novartis and More
- Executive Decision: Foster Wheeler CEO Ray Milchovich
- Cavs Owner Doesn't Mind Buzz Over James
- Trading Obama's Stimulus Plan
- What Bailouts?
- Your First Move For Tuesday December 2nd
- Web Extra: Fast & Furious Trades For Tuesday
- Euro Shares Add to Previous Session Slump
- European Stocks Point to Early Losses
- Australia Cuts Rates to 6-½ Year Low, May Cut Again
- Toyota to Cut Bonuses Amid Reports of Output Cuts
- China Eyes Consumer Boost, May Aim 8% 2009 Growth
- Australia Retail Sales Rise No Bar to Sharp Rate Cut
- Asia Slides on Economic Woes, Nikkei Slumps 6.4%
- Beyond Rate Cuts: Other Fed Tools Against Downturn
- Paulson's Speech on the Economy and Financial System

![]() |
CNBC.com |
Even the insiders I’m talking to, who know far more than I do, and who will be at the table, are answering my questions with: “Honestly, I’m just not sure.”
However, Treasury officials have said that the plan would likely involve the government purchasing mortgage backed securities as well as whole loans. Now the mortgage securitization process is so ridiculously complex, that I’m not even going to begin to explain where in the process the government could step in, so let’s stick to the whole loan side of the equation.
If the government is buying loans in order to get them off the balance sheets of distressed banks, and these loans are expected to be delinquent at some point soon, then what is the government's course of action once they take ownership of the loans?
Last fall, Henry Paulson spearheaded the “Hope Now” coalition of lenders and investors, the purpose of said coalition being to save borrowers by modifying and restructuring troubled loans. Does the government now join "Hope Now" itself and get in the loan modification business? But wait, if the government’s goal is to maximize taxpayer return, then that is in direct conflict with letting borrowers off the hook, right?
The politicians want the loans saved and the homeowners kept afloat, but that, in most cases, means losing money on the loan. Then there’s the issue of selling the asset at a discount…does that produce more return than the loan restructuring?
What I’ve heard is that the government would hold these assets to “maturity.” But again we’re faced with the unknown. We don’t know how many of these assets (loans) will perform and how many won’t.
Just putting my questions out there.
For Investors
- Is It Time to Buy Stocks Now?
- Measuring Risk in Volatile Times
- What the Experts Think You Should Do
- Is Your Money-Market Fund Safe? Find Out
- Slideshow: Biggest Chapter 11 Cases in US History
- Eight Tips for Investing in Hard Times
Questions? Comments?



