Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Commercial Conundrum
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Bank-owned Inventory: Move it!
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Blog You!!!
- Nora Tobin Answers Our Call
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
REALTY CHECK VIDEO
RSS FEED

![]() |
CNBC.com |
Even the insiders I’m talking to, who know far more than I do, and who will be at the table, are answering my questions with: “Honestly, I’m just not sure.”
However, Treasury officials have said that the plan would likely involve the government purchasing mortgage backed securities as well as whole loans. Now the mortgage securitization process is so ridiculously complex, that I’m not even going to begin to explain where in the process the government could step in, so let’s stick to the whole loan side of the equation.
If the government is buying loans in order to get them off the balance sheets of distressed banks, and these loans are expected to be delinquent at some point soon, then what is the government's course of action once they take ownership of the loans?
Last fall, Henry Paulson spearheaded the “Hope Now” coalition of lenders and investors, the purpose of said coalition being to save borrowers by modifying and restructuring troubled loans. Does the government now join "Hope Now" itself and get in the loan modification business? But wait, if the government’s goal is to maximize taxpayer return, then that is in direct conflict with letting borrowers off the hook, right?
The politicians want the loans saved and the homeowners kept afloat, but that, in most cases, means losing money on the loan. Then there’s the issue of selling the asset at a discount…does that produce more return than the loan restructuring?
What I’ve heard is that the government would hold these assets to “maturity.” But again we’re faced with the unknown. We don’t know how many of these assets (loans) will perform and how many won’t.
Just putting my questions out there.
For Investors
- Is It Time to Buy Stocks Now?
- Measuring Risk in Volatile Times
- What the Experts Think You Should Do
- Is Your Money-Market Fund Safe? Find Out
- Slideshow: Biggest Chapter 11 Cases in US History
- Eight Tips for Investing in Hard Times
Questions? Comments?










