BUFFETT:  No, it would get worse.  Last week will look like Nirvana (laughs) if they don't do something.   I think they will.  I understand where they're very mad about what's happened in the past, but this isn't the time to vent your spleen about that.  This is the time to do something that gets this country back on the right track.  What you have, Joe, you have all the major institutions in the world trying to deleverage.  And we want them to deleverage, but they're trying to deleverage at the same time.  Well, if huge institutions are trying to deleverage, you need someone in the world that's willing to leverage up.  And there's no one that can leverage up except the United States government.  And what they're talking about is leveraging up to the tune of 700 billion, to in effect, offset the deleveraging that's going on through all the financial institutions.  And I might add, if they do it right, and I think they will do it reasonably right, they won't do it perfectly right,  I think they'll make a lot of money.  Because if they don't -- they shouldn't buy these debt instruments at what the institutions paid.  They shouldn't buy them at what they're carrying, what the carrying value is, necessarily.  They should buy them at the kind of prices that are available in the market.  People who are buying these instruments in the market are expecting to make 15 to 20 percent on those instruments.  If the government makes anything over its cost of borrowing, this deal will come out with a profit.  And I would bet it will come out with a profit, actually.

BECKY:  Are you buying instruments like these in the market?

BUFFETT:  Well, I don't want to leverage up.  No one wants to leverage up in this thing.  So, if I could buy a hundred billion of these kinds of instruments at today's prices, and borrow non-recourse 90 billion, which I can't, but if I could do that, I would do that with the expectation of significant profit.

JOE:  But the government can do that.  You can't.  And that's why the private sector can't, even you, can't save the system.

BUFFETT:  I can't come close to it.  But they have the ability to borrow.  They can borrow much cheaper than I can borrow.  They can borrow unlimited.  They don't have covenants.  They don't have -- I mean, they are in the ideal position.  So, for example, if I were hiring advisers, as I talked about doing to buy these things, I would tell those advisers, 'Look it!  People are buying these instruments to make 15 percent.  So if you're going to charge me any fees, I'm going to defer those fees until I get rid of these instruments later on.  If I don't make at least ten percent on my assets, you know, your fee goes down the drain.  Because it should be a lead-pipe cinch to make 10 percent at the kind of prices that exist now.  I wouldn't try to write that into the legislation.  I don't think you should  -- I think they should punish, in many cases, the people -- I would think they might insist on the directors of the institutions that participate in this program waiving all director's fees for a couple of years.  They should, maybe, eliminate bonues.  They may wish to do some of those things.  I don't think you should try to write it into the instrument, though.  I think that gets so damn complicated and ties people's hands.  But if I were administering the program, I think I'd be fairly tough about some of those things, and I'd make sure that the advisers earned me a return that was well above my cost of borrowing before they got paid a dime.

BECKY:  Would you administer the program? 

JOE:  Yeah, can you be on the oversight board?  (Buffett laughs.)  Can you be on the oversight board?

Charles Dharapak / AP Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke appear before the House Financial Services Committee on September 24, 2008.

BUFFETT:  I'd love to administer (laughs).  I'd love to administer it for nothing, but I would really love to administer and get some kind of an override in terms of the profits, which is naturally the way Wall Street thinks.  No, it's not my game to do that, but I will tell you that the buyers of the instruments these days are going to do better than the sellers.  And the big buyer, if they -- they shouldn't pay any attention to the cost of these instruments to the selling institutions.  They shouldn't pay any attention to the carrying value.  In fact, one thing you might do, is if someone wants to sell a hundred billion of these instruments to the Treasury, let them sell two or three billion in the market and then have the Treasury match that, for what they pay.  You don't want the Treasury to be a patsy.   But I'll tell you, with Hank Paulson on top of it, you couldn't have any better guy to do that.  The important thing is that if this program extends into the next administration is to have somebody in the next administration that has similar market savvy.

PART TWO OF THE BUFFETT TRANSCRIPT:
FATEFUL ENCOUNTER AT THE WORLD'S FAIR                        

Current Berkshire stock prices:

Class A:

US%3bBRK.A loading...

Quote  |  Chart  |  News  |  Profile

[US;BRK.A  Loading...      ()   ]

Class B:

US%3bBRK.B loading...

Quote  |  Chart  |  News  |  Profile

[US;BRK.B  Loading...      ()   ]

Goldman Sachs:

GS loading...

Quote  |  Chart  |  News  |  Profile

[GS  Loading...      ()   ]

Questions?  Comments?  Email me at