Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES
 

  Current Housing Indicators
CURRENTPREVIOUS
Existing Home Sales4.91m5.02m
New Home Sales460,000520,000
Housing Starts817,000872,000
Building Permits786,000857,000
HMI1417
Existing Home Prices$203,100▼ (annually)$224,400
New Home Prices$221,900▼ (annually)$236,500
 
Realty Check Video Gallery
The $800 billion move from Treasury is having a big impact on mortgage rates. Greg McBride, of Bankrate.com, and CNBC's ...
There were more troubling statistics out today in the housing sector, and CNBC's Diana Olick has the details.
 
HOMEBUILDERS TOP 10 INDEX
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
See all Realty Check PostsRealty Check with Diana Olick
Text Size
Sep.26
2:54 PM ET
Friday, 26 Sep 2008
Why Not Bail Out The Housing Speculators? Really!

Government Bailout
In all the talk of all the differing bailout plans, one little mantra of all the lawmakers as well as the regulators and the President is, "Of course we won't bail out the speculators, those who made money investing in homes and then flipping them for a profit."

Ok, I realize this may not be a very popular point of view, but may I ask the question: Why Not??

It seems to me that housing is a commodity. Maybe it didn't start out that way, but it sure became that way. Donald Trump made a fortune on real estate, and nobody punished him, in fact he got a job punishing "apprentices" who wanted to be just like him. So if housing is a commodity, then why is it so evil to trade on its futures, like cattle or soybean. A home is an equity as well, so what's wrong with trading it like a stock?

Here we are talking about bailing out all the investors who traded on the mortgages that allowed speculators to buy and sell the homes, why can't we give the speculators a break too? If we allowed speculators to get in on the refi and modification programs from the government and private sector (they are specifically barred from the FHA program), then perhaps we could stem a bit of the price plunges in the housing market by preventing an awful lot of foreclosures.

I just don't think it's fair to pick and choose among investors, to decide that some are fine and others are the cause of trouble. I don't believe that a person who invests in a condo with the intention to sell it at a higher price is any different than an investor who buys a stock with the same end game in mind. Is it because stocks are on paper and homes are on streets? Well, there's an argument there, but investment homes can be rented to lower income folks who need a place to live. They can also be lived in by investors as they wait for their equity to accrue.

Let's be careful, in all this blaming and bailing, that we don't choose to favor one investor group over another.

  • Lending Coming to a Halt?
  • US Bailout in Chaos
  • Central Banks Dole Out More Cash
  • Credit Markets Are Still Frozen
  • Questions?  Comments? 
    © 2008 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Permalink: /id/26904853

    HOME  |  NEWS  |  MARKETS  |  EARNINGS  |  INVESTING  |  VIDEO  |  CNBC TV  |  CNBC PLUS  |  CNBC MOBILE  |  CNBC HD+
    About CNBC   |   Site Map   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service   |   Advertise   |   Help   |   Feedback   |   Video Reprints
      Data is a real-time snapshot   *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes

    Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis