Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.91m | ▼ | 5.02m |
| New Home Sales | 460,000 | ▼ | 520,000 |
| Housing Starts | 817,000 | ▼ | 872,000 |
| Building Permits | 786,000 | ▼ | 857,000 |
| HMI | 14 | ▼ | 17 |
| Existing Home Prices | $203,100 | ▼ (annually) | $224,400 |
| New Home Prices | $221,900 | ▼ (annually) | $236,500 |
- The Investor "Revolt" Over Modified Loans
- Predictions: 9 For '09 In Real Estate
- For Manhattan, The Issue Is Now Those Maintenance Fees
- The $500 Billion Buy Up Of MBS: Is It Really Enough?
- FHA's New Risky Loans Make Housing Even Riskier
- Fear Gripping Commercial Real Estate—But Question Is Why?
- Reasons NOT To Modify Troubled Home Loans
- Bailout For Builders—Are They Next In Line?
- Homeowners: Not Just About Buying—It's Also About Investing
- Bailout Anger Boiling: "Is Kashkari A Chump?"
- Stop Trading!: Cheap-Oil Plays
- California's Budget Crisis: Just Part Of "Cuckoo Land"?
- Is "Dexter" Hero Of Our Times?
- Stock Picker: No Place Like Home (Builders)
- Sumner Redstone's Next Step Is Juggling Debt
- Najarian on Options: A Bullish Move on BP
- The Investor "Revolt" Over Modified Loans
- Bowyer: NBER: the Official Sponsor of the 2007 Recession
- BEHIND THE MONEY: Goldman Can't Let Go
- Small Players Vie for ‘Green Car’ Loans
- Bailout Monitor Sees Lack of a Coherent Plan
- Pros: Searching the Gloom ... Bright Spot in Japan
- Putting a Value on a C.E.O.
- Where the Layoffs Are—Is Your Firm on the List?
- Treasurys Mostly Higher Despite Stock Gains
- BofA to Cut 10,000 Investment Banking Jobs
- GE to Maintain Dividend, Streamline Finance Arm
- Delta Air to Reduce Capacity By 6 to 8 Percent

![]() |
Ok, I realize this may not be a very popular point of view, but may I ask the question: Why Not??
It seems to me that housing is a commodity. Maybe it didn't start out that way, but it sure became that way. Donald Trump made a fortune on real estate, and nobody punished him, in fact he got a job punishing "apprentices" who wanted to be just like him. So if housing is a commodity, then why is it so evil to trade on its futures, like cattle or soybean. A home is an equity as well, so what's wrong with trading it like a stock?
Here we are talking about bailing out all the investors who traded on the mortgages that allowed speculators to buy and sell the homes, why can't we give the speculators a break too? If we allowed speculators to get in on the refi and modification programs from the government and private sector (they are specifically barred from the FHA program), then perhaps we could stem a bit of the price plunges in the housing market by preventing an awful lot of foreclosures.
I just don't think it's fair to pick and choose among investors, to decide that some are fine and others are the cause of trouble. I don't believe that a person who invests in a condo with the intention to sell it at a higher price is any different than an investor who buys a stock with the same end game in mind. Is it because stocks are on paper and homes are on streets? Well, there's an argument there, but investment homes can be rented to lower income folks who need a place to live. They can also be lived in by investors as they wait for their equity to accrue.
Let's be careful, in all this blaming and bailing, that we don't choose to favor one investor group over another.




