More Videos
- Cisco Jumps; Rest of Market to Follow?
- Call It 'Microsoft Math'
- Intel in the Anti-Trust Crosshairs, but Why?
- Apple Apps—Now More Than 100K
- WoW Fights New Front in China
- Smart Phone Competition Heats Up. Again.
- A Tale of Two Smart Phone Makers
- Avatar Hype Soars Thanks to Tech
- AMD's Ruiz Gets Tripped by Idle Chit-Chat
- Amazon is to eBay What Google is to Yahoo
MOST SHARED
- Solar Market Heating Back Up?
- Realty Execs See Pain Ahead
- US Becomes Top Country Brand Under Obama: Survey
- Sweeping Health Care Overhaul Bill Passes House
- BoA Board in Civil War Over Lewis' Succesor
- Easy Money & Stocks
- Administration Rejects Plan to Buy Fannie Mae Credits
- Want the Homebuyer's Tax Credit? Here Are Some Tips
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Tommy Lee, Medical Tourism and Nasty Santa, Your Emails
- U.S. Markets Gain 3% for the Week Despite 10.2% Unemployment
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Stimulus II? Jobs Tax Credit=Cash For Clunkers
- Rockwell Automation Earnings: What Options Are Saying
- Gold Will Touch Higher Lows and Higher Highs: Analyst
- Is Misery Alive And Well in Your Office?
- Consumers Haven't Changed, They Are Just Pickier
- Sweeping Health Care Overhaul Bill Passes House
- For the Jobless, 10% is Harder Than Before
- Week Ahead: Stocks Search for Catalyst in Quiet Week
- Outlook: Dollar Likely to Ride Higher on Bleak Jobs Report
- Geithner: More Stimulus, Not a Bank Tax
- Windfall is Seen as Bank Bonuses are Paid in Stock
- Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Says Net Income Tripled
- Cramer: Earnings, IPOs Dominate Next Week
- Buying Fear: How to Own Volatility
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
But such is the case today for Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
], from the likes of RBC Capital , Morgan Stanley and Barclays (though Barclays merely reinitiated with a lower price target.) Morgan Stanley took its target from $178 to $115. RBC went from $200 to $140.
So why now, why all of a sudden and why so much pessimism around these shares?
Well, first things first: fundamentals be damned. I don't think this is necessarily about what Apple itself might be doing wrong. It seems to be far more "macro" than "micro." I spoke to one analyst this morning who says the economy is such a mess right now with so much concern about the consumer, that a year from now no one wants to look back and say "how could you have possibly missed that?" Whether Apple products are still selling well or not.
Research in Motion's [RIMM
Loading...
()
] lousy numbers and outlook spooked the Street last week, no question. Even if there were strong suggestions that the company's problems stemmed from competition with Apple and not because of some weakness in the market place. And because of RIM's numbers, there's also concern about margin's coming down, even though Piper Jaffray, a long-time Apple bull, says that Apple's insistence of 30 percent is in place merely to keep Wall Street's expectations in line.
If that's the case, that strategy might be backfiring. Oh, and there's also concern about multiple compression. Well, duh! Remember that RIM's numbers would only be a harbinger (maybe) of Apple's smart phone business. Unlike RIM--and this is so important--Apple's got those other two legs supporting the table in Mac and iPod. In other words, RIM hardly provides a peek at what to expect from the far more diversified Apple.
To that end, NPD, Piper and some other market research are all still projecting 5 percent upside to Street numbers for both Macs and iPods. The company has $21 billion in cash in the bank. The "platform" is being adopted. Again, fundamentals be damned.
I suspect that if Apple misses its numbers in a few weeks, this analysis this morning will look pretty spot on. But if Apple blows through those expectations, and beats, these analysts can seek cover under the guise that these concerns today, mirroring the macro-economic condition, could gain a foothold at any time over the next year or so and they thought that now would be a good time to sound the alarm bell.
Trouble is, this kind of the thing tends to become a self-fulfilling prophecy, which means this analysis--any analysis--can't be wrong. Even if it might be. And that's a rough place for investors to be if they're trying to, well, invest.
Sure, you can insist as much as you want that you're not drunk, but if five or six of your friends tell you you're drunk, you're probably drunk. I don't think that's what's happening here. I think instead these reports are suggesting that Apple "might" be drunk, "could become" drunk.
Anything's possible, I suppose. Investors, however, ought to focus instead on what's probable. Analysts might want to try that as well.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes