- Who Were the Biggest Winners And Losers This Year?
- GE, Comcast Complete Deal Over NBC Universal: Source
- US May Raise Rates Before Jobs Recover: Fed's Plosser
- Stocks Likely Don't Need Santa to Keep Rally Going
- Larry Kudlow's Open Letter to Tiger Woods
- AIG Slashes US Debt Under Deal With New York Fed
- Seamstress Fined $5.7 Million for Insider Trading
- Super Fantasy Christmas Gifts of 2009
- Commercial Property Fears Are Overblown: Zell, LeFrak
- BofA On Proposed Changes In The Housing Bailout Program
- The Future of The Media Landscape
- November Auto Sales Muddle Along
- Busch: What Obama Won't Say Tonight
- Stick with Equities—Avoid Emerging Markets: Laszlo Birinyi
- Pfizer Chomps On A Carrot
- Predictions 2010: Technology
- Predictions 2010: Consumers
- Predictions 2010: The Big Picture
Text Size 
The U.S. Congress needs to get out of 'pointing fingers' mode and pass legislation that is sensible and addresses the problem of impact of the financial crisis on the economy, Wilbur Ross Jr., chairman and CEO of WL Ross & Co. told CNBC's Asia Squawk Box.
_____________________________________
What To Do Now:
- Jim Cramer's Crisis Stock Guide
- Poll: Should the Fed Cut Rates?
_____________________________________
And it needs to be done quickly. "I think the people who voted against it should be ashamed of what they did. In order to save a $700 billion investment -- not spending, but investment --they caused investors a trillion dollars. That means for each of the guys that voted against it, it cost the investing public $4 million today," Ross said.
Ross thinks that the U.S. is a lot worse off not passing the bill because of all the buildup in expectations leading to the vote.
"It would have been one thing if they never took up the bill. But to take it up with both the chairman of Fed and the Secretary of Treasury, both of whom are viewed as knowledgeable and respected people, say it was essential -- for the leadership of Congress to say it was essential and then turn it down is a real downer," Ross commented.
Ross believes that we will see consequences of the bailout's rejection in the money markets, the debt markets and the stock markets. The failure of the vote will simply make matters worse and ultimately cost more.
Going forward, Ross suggests that perhaps it may be better to share the pain. He says owners of affected mortgage should write them down at today's market value. Repayment schedules should be set such that borrowers will not pay more than 38 percent of their income. The government can then insure half the reduced mortgage, charge a fee and get one third of any appreciation and value of that house from the discounted price. The lender who made the sacrifice should get one third and the home owner one third.
"That I think would have dealt very directly with the mortgage crisis. They could have put in the same oversight, the same restrictions on executive pay, all those bells and whistles but at least then you'd have a big program, very fine tuned to address the actual problem which is unavailability of mortgages today," Ross added.
Print
Email
- Will the Fed raise rates? Will the dollar continue its slide? CNBC experts weigh in on the year ahead.
- Goldman Sachs has forbidden employees from gathering in private holiday parties of 12 or more.
- Do you have what it takes to run your own business? Ask yourself these questions.
- Heavily armed pirates in Somalia have set up a sort of stock exhange to fund their hijackings.
- Since its launch in 1998, Google has become a primary force on the Internet. How much do you know about the company?
- A famed author has written all his work on an old typewriter that is now up for auction. The NYT reports.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes