More Videos
MOST SHARED
- Australia's ANZ Bank to Slash 1,000 Jobs
- Greece Debt Drama Is Downside Risk to $100 Oil: Survey
- Apple Launches New Legal Attack on Samsung Phones
- Looking for News Value in People's Daily IPO
- 787 Glitch to Take Days to Fix: Boeing
- Euro Gains as Greece Parliament Endorses Austerity Steps
- Gold Rises on Greek Austerity Bill, Off 2-Week Low
- Asia's Aviation Boom Comes With Rising Competition
- China City Suspends Plans to Ease Property Controls
- Greek Lawmakers Approve Austerity Bill as Athens Burns
- US Stocks Avoid Closing Down Over 1%, Again
- In Search of America's ‘Hottest Forecasters’
- Dow vs. S&P 500: Which is a Better Investment?
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- Avis on the Road to Strong Growth: Analyst
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- LinkedIn’s Growth Is Already Priced In: Analyst
- The Real Reason Behind Bank of America’s Rally
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- Greece's Debt Drama Is Downside Risk to $100 Oil
- Japan's Economy Shrinks More Than Expected
- China Tells Banks to Roll Over Local Government Loans
- Pop Queen Whitney Houston Dies on Eve of Grammys
- Dreamliner Glitch Won't Impact Output: Boeing
- Asia's Aviation Boom Comes With Rising Competition
- Apple Launches New Legal Attack on Samsung Phones
- Low-Interest Loans to European Banks Prompt Concern
- British Bankers Arrested in Tax Probe
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
Apple And Street Need To Do Better Job With Each Other
 |
Apple Store 5th Ave NY |
] and its prospects, both for this quarter and the coming year. The week started with downgrades and pessimism from RBC Capital and Morgan Stanley. But yesterday, in the face of a strong wind against these shares, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs both stepped up to say that Apple's actually in pretty good shape. Maybe lowering price targets, but still bullish on longer-term trends.
It's a matter of perspective and balance and true analysis. And that's where Wall Street might not be measuring up when it comes to studying not just Apple, but indeed so many other companies and their fundamentals. Take, for example, the study released by RBC and ChangeWave, purporting to show a slowdown in Apple's business, and therefore the reason behind the firm's downgrade.
But rather than just offering up the results of the survey, they beg for some deeper perspective. RBC determined that 17 percent of respondents are likely to buy a Mac laptop in the next 90 days, down from 19 percent a month earlier. And 23 percent say they were likely to buy a Mac desktop, down from 24 percent a month earlier. I don't know about you, and I hardly want to be the one trying to accentuate the positive, but it seems those declines are very, VERY slight, and in an economy like this one, a miniscule decline for expensive products in the consumer electronics space might actually be good news.
I understand that Apple's slowdown, if there even is one, isn't great. But if the slowdown--again, if there even IS one--is occurring at a far slower pace than the rest of the sector, isn't that good? Also, it seems none of these analysts is worried about the current quarter, but what may happen some time next year. If at all. If this macro-economic slowdown continues, or deepens. Which Apple has already shown it can withstand better than most.
More galling to me is the underlying concern that Apple won't be able to meet gross margins expectations.. Why galling? Apple expected margins of 30 percent and said so. The Street then ratcheted up its expectations to 33 percent. Apple says 30 percent. Maintains 30 percent. Now, there's concern on the Street that Apple won't meet expectations. Not its own, but the Street's! And analysts slam the company over worries that it will come up short. Come on. What kind of bizarre game is that?
I don't doubt RBC's data, or the real concern the firm apparently has about Apple's future. This firm, and analyst Mike Abramsky, do solid work. There are certainly two sides--maybe 12 or 20 sides--and that's what makes a market.
I know Wall Street has a job to do. So does Apple. Apple routinely sandbags numbers, I believe, to lower expectations so it can "beat the Street" when it releases earnings. They need to do better offering realistic guidance.
But the Street also needs to do a better job managing its own expectations, and offering meaningful analysis of the data, not just the data itself. Both sides of the story.
Apple's volatility, as these two sides bicker about the numbers, has been the end result. With investor nest eggs hanging on the balance.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
