- Is Super Bowl Halftime Act Too Old?
- Will TCU See The "Flutie Effect?"
- NBA D-League On The Rise
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Boise State Stock Plan: An Early Success
- Dollar Signs Seen In Young "Buck" Jennings
- Iverson Wasn't A Popular "Answer"
- My Top 10 Marketing Ideas For Winless Nets
- Airlines Add 'Super Bowl' Tax
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Tiger Woods Out of Hospital After Accident
- The Good Entrepreneur Winner
- Get Paid Six Figures to Wear a T-Shirt?
- Dubai Spooks Investors But May Bring Buying Opportunity
- Global Selloff From Dubai Woes Shows Signs of Winding Down
- Longer Lines, Fuller Carts This Black Friday
- Halftime Report: Dubai - First Ripple Of Larger Crisis?
- 8 Retailers that Gain During the Holidays
- Next Week: Cash In Now Or Wait For A Santa Rally?
- U.S. Stocks Fall on Dubai Worries
- Black Friday at Best Buy
- Strategists on Dubai: Avoid 'Rash Moves' Now
- Longer Lines, Fuller Carts This Black Friday
- Dubai Stock Market Fear Has 'Legs': Dennis Gartman
- Obama's Emission Reduction Pledge Paints Future for Autos
- Is Super Bowl Halftime Act Too Old?
- Surprising Options Trades in TiVo Shares
- EA Sports Hopes to Pump Up Sales Through Pop-Up Locations
- Global Selloff From Dubai Shows Signs of Winding Down
- Dubai Stock Selloff May Bring Buying Opportunity
- Longer Lines, Fuller Carts This Black Friday
- Tiger Woods Out of Hospital After Accident
- Dubai Fallout Is a Correction, Not Another Crisis: El-Erian
- Dubai's Debt Woes Signal New Era for Creditors
- Get Paid Six Figures to Wear a T-Shirt?
- The World's Biggest Debtor Nations
- Five Tips for Buying a Foreclosed Home
Sports Biz
![]() |
NBA Referee |
Releasing the report likely didn't change the opinions by the skeptical fans out there one bit. In fact, 82.6 percent of people that voted in an ESPN.com poll said they didn't believe the report that Donaghy was the only NBA referee involved in gambling.
I've read the entire report and I must say that--on the whole--I'm pretty impressed by how comprehensive it is. At the end of the day, you want to trust a report like this that gives details of the scruntized games and says that there might have, at times, been bad calls, but nothing to indicate any favoritism.
But that's me. That's not the average fan. So what could the league have done to really change opinions? The new age way to do this was to release the report, but also offer a YouTube video.
In this video, you'd have a panel of league officials reviewing the Donaghy games as well as the games of other questioned officials including Scott Foster and Dick Bavetta. On this panel, you'd also have a gambling expert. Because if there's one thing missing from this report, there's absolutely no mention of spreads.
One of the NBA's main critics, gambling expert R.J. Bell of Pregame.com, says that even though the NBA noted that it didn't find anything strange with the way Donaghy and Foster called games, the two had big line moves (swings of more than 2 points) in 13 percent of their games. The average line move, Bell claims, is about 6 percent.
Fans ultimately want to SEE that nothing happened, they don't want to be told. My take is you might as well give them what they want.
Questions? Comments?








