- Is Merck A Drug Bellwether?
- Pfizer's Statin Study: What A Coincidence!
- Sam Waksal: "Moving On Up" To The East Side
- Another "Short" Story About Pfizer & Dendreon
- Predictions: 9 For '09 In Pharma
- Johnson & Johnson Is Latest FDA Casualty
- Genentech: Roche Says One Thing, Investors Say Another
- Schering-Plough: The Reviews Are In
- Pharma Updates And What You Need To Know
- The Emails Fly On GM, Ford CEO's Corporate Jets
- Wall of Shame: Fortress Investment's Wes Edens
- Cramer to Geithner: Let FDIC Chair Keep Her Job
- Lightning Round: Boeing, Medtronic, Agrium and More
- Lightning Round OT: Continental, Amylin Pharma and More
- Sell Block: Cramer's Solution for Mortgage-Backed Paper Mess
- Toll Brothers CEO's Housing Outlook
- Making Money Off M&A
- Your First Move For Friday December 5th
- Web Extra: Fast & Furious Trades For Friday
- Boeing Mulls Pushing Back Dreamliner Deliveries
- Chief Executive Quits Australian Publisher Fairfax
- Asian Markets Wobble on Gloomy Economic Outlook
- Motor Racing-Honda Pulls Out of Formula One
- Job Cuts Picking Up Steam Just in Time for Holidays
- Pros Say: Bear Market Rallies = New Reality
- CEOs Sound Off: Budget Deficit, Bailouts & More
- Bernanke: 'More Needs To Be Done' on Foreclosures
- Bernanke's Speech on Housing and Foreclosures

![]() |
In my reporting, I always try to keep it simple. Particularly in the middle of the credit crisis, too much financial jargon goes over the heads of most people. The same can be said for biopharma coverage. The challenge for reporters is to make the stuff comprehensible for readers, viewers and listeners. But I think it's also incumbent on corporate communications folks to try to communicate in plain English.
So, this morning, partners Roche and Genentech[DNA
Loading...
()
] issued separate press releases on positive test results on their drug Rituxan for a form of leukemia. DNA also shares Rituxan with Biogen Idec[BIIB
Loading...
()
]. Genentech's release reads like this: "Rituxan in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy met its primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival, as assessed by investigators, in patients with previously treated CD-20-positive chronic lymphocytic leukemia compared to chemotherapy alone." Come again?
Fortunately, someone at Roche found a clearer, more succinct way to put it. "Patients treated with (Rituxan) in combination with current standard chemotherapy were able to significantly extend the amount of time they lived without their disease progressing, compared to patients treated with chemotherapy alone." That's pretty close to how I would've written it for presentation on CNBC.
I suspect that oftentimes the scientists and lawyers have too much of a hand in writing this stuff. Let communications people communicate. There's a way to balance the rigors of the law and medicine without getting so bogged down in arcane language that is only decipherable by experts, doctors and analysts. In the news biz, it's called, "dumbing it down." And I don't mean that in a bad or offensive way. It can actually be helpful.
Clarification: Eli Lilly's[LLY
Loading...
()
] press release yesterday about the ImClone [IMCL
Loading...
()
]deal said, "The transaction is not subject to any financing condition...." I was mistaken to interpret that to mean no financing was needed. LLY is going to finance part of the all-cash deal with debt. In my interview with CEO John Lechleiter on "Squawk Box" Monday he said, "We're very confident in our ability to finance this deal."
Questions? Comments?




