SPECIAL REPORT
MOST SHARED
- How Nasdaq Lost Control of Facebook IPO, by the Minute
- Marc Faber: 100% Chance of Global Recession
- Fresh Fears as EU Finalises Reform Plans
- Spain's Bankia Eyes Stake Sales After Record Bailout
- What College Tuition Will Look Like in 18 Years
- Don't Fall for Cheap, Debt-Laden US Stocks: Expert
- Don’t Trust Buybacks
- Facebook: The Song — Yes, We're Serious
- A New Look at the ‘New Poor’
- Six Pack: Beer Buzz of the Week
- Greek Exit Could Trigger 50% Fall in Euro Stocks: Analyst
- Under Pressure, FHA Skews to Wealthier Home Buyers
- Big Stock Upside for Hudson City Deal: Analyst
- 5 High-Yield Stocks Ready to Boost Dividends
- Yoshikami: Four Things You Need to Know About Gold Now
- Steinbock: The Euro Zone Endgame Begins
- Option Bulls Take Another Shot on Idenix
- Week Ahead: Europe Has Wall Street Bull on Short Leash
- Citigroup Lost $20 Million on Facebook IPO Trades
- JPMorgan to Shake Up Risk Team After Big Loss: Report
- EU Finalizes Bank Reforms; Shifts Burden to Bondholders
- Spain's Bankia Eyes Stake Sales After Record Bailout
- EU Set to Launch Action Against China Over Telecom Aid
- Marc Faber: Chance of Global Recession Is Now 100%
- Cool Jobs: From Gold Stacker to Bed Tester
- 'Flash Sale' Sites: Gimmick, or Online Shopping Future?
RSS FEED
Pharma's Market
Roche Speaks My Language But Genentech Not So Much
![]() |
In my reporting, I always try to keep it simple. Particularly in the middle of the credit crisis, too much financial jargon goes over the heads of most people. The same can be said for biopharma coverage. The challenge for reporters is to make the stuff comprehensible for readers, viewers and listeners. But I think it's also incumbent on corporate communications folks to try to communicate in plain English.
So, this morning, partners Roche and Genentech[DNA
Loading...
()
] issued separate press releases on positive test results on their drug Rituxan for a form of leukemia. DNA also shares Rituxan with Biogen Idec[BIIB
Loading...
()
]. Genentech's release reads like this: "Rituxan in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy met its primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival, as assessed by investigators, in patients with previously treated CD-20-positive chronic lymphocytic leukemia compared to chemotherapy alone." Come again?
Fortunately, someone at Roche found a clearer, more succinct way to put it. "Patients treated with (Rituxan) in combination with current standard chemotherapy were able to significantly extend the amount of time they lived without their disease progressing, compared to patients treated with chemotherapy alone." That's pretty close to how I would've written it for presentation on CNBC.
I suspect that oftentimes the scientists and lawyers have too much of a hand in writing this stuff. Let communications people communicate. There's a way to balance the rigors of the law and medicine without getting so bogged down in arcane language that is only decipherable by experts, doctors and analysts. In the news biz, it's called, "dumbing it down." And I don't mean that in a bad or offensive way. It can actually be helpful.
Clarification: Eli Lilly's[LLY
Loading...
()
] press release yesterday about the ImClone [IMCL
Loading...
()
]deal said, "The transaction is not subject to any financing condition...." I was mistaken to interpret that to mean no financing was needed. LLY is going to finance part of the all-cash deal with debt. In my interview with CEO John Lechleiter on "Squawk Box" Monday he said, "We're very confident in our ability to finance this deal."
Questions? Comments?










