- Investors Uneasy Ahead of Earnings and Economic Data
- What's Behind This Morning's Weakness
- Discount Stores Thrive in Sign of the Times
- The Long and Short of UNG
- Retails Reeling
- Here Comes the Earnings Parade
- It's All About The Dollar....And Commodities
- The Slide for Commodity Stocks Continues
- How Strong Is The Recovery?
- The Dow Down, But Not Out
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- The View From Newark
- Preparing for Retirement
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Man in the Middle of it All
- Playing by Different Rules
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
- Will Bernanke Get Tapped for A Second Term?
- News Corp Denies Guardian Celebrity Wiretap Story
- It's Not the Wealthy Who Are Leaving California: Study
- Atlantic City Takes Hit as Pennsylvania Casino Opens
- Recession Special: Steak for $5!
- Digital Eyes Will Chart Baseball’s Unseen Skills
RSS FEED
More Videos
Text Size 
I've been asked many times today why energy stocks are again underperforming the market. There are several explanations:
1) When oil prices go down sharply, energy stocks underperform. This is the simplest--and most direct explanation for the decline. Further, many analysts are now attempting to estimate energy stock earnings based on oil at around $60, rather than $100 where it was a few weeks ago.
2) the leverage factor is going away. Much of the outperformance in energy in the last several years has been due to hedge funds getting aggressively involved under very high leverage. On top of this, hedge funds have fewer prime brokerage firms to borrow from.
Besides a reduction in leverage, speculators are continuing to exit the market. Goldman[GS
Loading...
()
] and Morgan Stanley,[MS
Loading...
()
] who were among the largest speculative players in the oil market, cannot play to the same extent as before because they are commercial banks and cannot take the high risk profile they formerly assumed.
3) As a corollary to 2), there has been unusually tight ownership of energy--to be blunt, every fast money yo-yo on the planet was in commodities in the last 4-5 years, largely energy. Now all that is unwinding, and they are continuing to get margin calls.
4) Demand fears on global recession. There is talk of notable reductions in capital expenditures by major oil companies, which is impacting oil service companies.
If this decline in oil continues, the traditional tactic for those who must trade energy stocks is to go long the biggest names. That's because the biggest names have the longest time horizons and can be most conservative.
That's why, for example, ExxonMobil [XOM
Loading...
()
] is only down 15 percent this month, while most oil service names are down 30 to 40 percent. Exxon has $40 billion in cash, more stable than some countries! While ExxonMobil is down 9 percent today, the decline is small compared to the double digit declines in other energy and commodity stocks.
Take a look at Suncor,[SU
Loading...
()
] formerly a darling of the oil sands crowd; down 50 percent this month.
_____________________________
New from CNBC.com:
_____________________________
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes