- One-on-One With UFC's Dana White
- Will LeBron Dunk Tape Ever Be Released?
- What You'll See On My NASCAR Documentary Tonight
- Amazing Cycling in France For Make Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
- Gatorade Makes Limited Edition Jordan Bottles
- Staples To Cash In On Jackson's Funeral
- Lacoste Runs Full Page Ad With Roddick Loss
- Is Andy’s Mojo Back? We Asked Him
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- Singh Not Wearing Stanford At Tournament
RSS FEED
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Warren Buffett's Complete Sun Valley CNBC Interview - Transcript and Video
- Preparing for Retirement
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon Counting
- The View From Newark
- Investing in Tech Now
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- One-on-One With UFC's Dana White
- Improving Morale Vital to Success and Survival
- Global Stimulus: Boosting Water Stocks
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Schork Oil Outlook: It’s Now or Never for the Bulls
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Farrell: Let's Enjoy the Numbers for a Moment
- Call Of Shame - Vote Now
- Schmidt on Social Media, Ads and Hulu
- Obama Struggles With His Healthcare Overhaul
- GM CEO Henderson Says New GM Must Succeed
- World Has Avoided Economic Disaster, Obama Says
- Farrell: Let's Enjoy the Numbers for a Moment
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Geithner Seeks Clampdown on Derivatives Dealers
- A Muscle Car to the Rescue for General Motors
- Recession Special: Steak for $5!
- UBS Can't Comply with US Request: Internal Memo

![]() |
U.S. Trademark and Patent Office |
But when his trademark was published for opposition, the Red Sox opposed its use. According to a report we've obtained, the Red Sox opposition of the mark was upheld.
The Red Sox opposed the trademark based on its similarity to their logo, that it was immoral and scandalous, that it disparaged the team and falsely suggested that the team endorsed it.
In its opposition, the Red Sox connected the term 'rod' to the male anatomy and the court was not pleased that Sherman had registered the mark to use it on children's wear. But one of the main issues for the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which hears these cases, is that Sherman couldn't produce any goods that he had put the mark on.
In the end, the board agreed on some points with the Red Sox enough to keep Sherman from using the mark, but the board did not agree that people would think that the Red Sox endorsed or sponsored the design.
Questions? Comments?










