- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Boise State Stock Plan: An Early Success
- Dollar Signs Seen In Young "Buck" Jennings
- Iverson Wasn't A Popular "Answer"
- My Top 10 Marketing Ideas For Winless Nets
- Airlines Add 'Super Bowl' Tax
- Chicken Wing Finder Makes Debut
- Michelle Wie Wins, Now What?
- TV Series Inks Unique Deal For Fight
- The Breakdown: LeBron To Change To No. 6?
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Nielsen Ratings Coming to Video Games
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- The Week Ahead
- Bove: Expect Goldman To Increase Dividend Meaningfully
- Hershey Mulls $17 Billion Bid for Cadbury: Source
- Hot Topics at TEDMED
- Oil Next Week
- Realty Check: USDA Home Loans
- Lightning Round OT: Knight Capital, Ebix and More
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Holiday Tipping: Who And How Much
- Deep Discounts Should Make It a Very Tech-y Holiday
- Thanksgiving Week Stuffed With Economic News
- First Senate Vote Looms on Health Legislation
- Black Friday Deals May Not Signal Retail Comeback
- Victoria's Secret Hopes to Rekindle Desire for Lingerie
- UPS Sets New Rates For 2010
- Wall Street Jobs Slow to Return Despite Record Profits
- Investors to Goldman: Be Less Greedy
- Senate Panel to Mull Bernanke Nomination On Dec. 3
- $6M Verdict Upheld in McDonald's Strip Search Case
Sports Biz
![]() |
U.S. Trademark and Patent Office |
But when his trademark was published for opposition, the Red Sox opposed its use. According to a report we've obtained, the Red Sox opposition of the mark was upheld.
The Red Sox opposed the trademark based on its similarity to their logo, that it was immoral and scandalous, that it disparaged the team and falsely suggested that the team endorsed it.
In its opposition, the Red Sox connected the term 'rod' to the male anatomy and the court was not pleased that Sherman had registered the mark to use it on children's wear. But one of the main issues for the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which hears these cases, is that Sherman couldn't produce any goods that he had put the mark on.
In the end, the board agreed on some points with the Red Sox enough to keep Sherman from using the mark, but the board did not agree that people would think that the Red Sox endorsed or sponsored the design.
Questions? Comments?









