BIO
- Zero China Growth Is ‘Probable’: Gordon Chang
- How to Trade on the Jobs Report
- Don’t Trust Buybacks
- Buying the Right Sell-Off Stocks
- Buy Broken Stocks, Not Broken Companies
- The Biggest Market Myth There Is?
- How Low Can the Euro Go?
- The Key to a Successful Turnaround
- Your First Move For Tuesday May 29th
- Chesapeake Should Rally Into $20’s: Pro Trader
RSS FEED
Text Size 
Obama's Tax Hike For Wealthy—Why Young Should Embrace It
 |
Casey Serin Taxes |
In any Economics 101 class they'll teach you that when you tax workers' incomes at higher rates, which is what Obama plans to do for individuals making more than $200,000 a year and two-income families making more than $250,000 a year they do less work.
A tax-hike works like a pay-cut, and people work less if they're getting paid less. Here's the thing, when you're talking about workers making more than $200,000 a year, that doesn't mean they just cut back on their hours. Jobs that pay that well don't pay by the hour.
So when the economists say people will work less if you raise their income taxes, what's that mean for the highest earners among us, people who are overwhelmingly older? It means, at the margin, that they'll retire more frequently than they would have if taxes were lower, at least, as long as they can afford to retire.
More people at the top of the ladder retiring means more promotions for those of us who are on the lower rungs. Forget about redistributing the wealth, higher taxes on high earners should lead to better jobs for young people like us who are waiting for our elders to retire so we can work our way up the corporate food chain.
Lower taxes on high-earners mean that the old-folks are more likely to stick around as long as they can, and I have a sense that's been happening under the Bush regime. To switch metaphors, when taxes on the wealthy are low, they keep working, acting like somebody who refuses to get off the up-escalator after reaching the top, and that means less opportunity for younger people who are waiting at the bottom of the up-escalator.
Usually when people make the argument that higher taxes on the wealthy will cause more highly-skilled workers to do less work, they act like that's a bad thing. Not me. Those jobs are held by older workers, and they need to be vacated to make room for my generation. If you're part of the millennial generation like me, you should want high- earners to be taxed at a higher rate, so they'll retire and you can take their jobs, or the jobs under their jobs as everyone gets to climb up another rung on the corporate ladder. Rising taxes on the rich lift all but the wealthiest ships.
When we're all making over $200,000 a year, then we can turn on Obama's tax plan, but until then it's pure opportunity.
Questions? Comments? Send them to
- The Nasdaq has suffered the most from the EU crisis showing there's risk in the usual tech stocks.
- Targeting more Millennials is just one of the items brewing for consumers in the world of spirits.
- It seems many people may need a reminder of how NOT to act on a plane. Here are a few tips.
- Here are some very unusual roadside stops along American highways that might peek your interest.
- How three generations of Americans are dealing with the finances of retirement.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
