Trader Talk

The Big Three auto makers are meeting with the House leadership today, and they are going to be presenting scary numbers. GM in particular is likely burning through their cash horde of $25 b at a much faster rate than the $1 billion a month projecting a short while ago.

This is the moment of reckoning for these companies. I know no one on the Street who thinks GM and Chrysler, or their suppliers, will survive in the form and structure that they currently exist in.

In addition to having GMAC become a bank holding company (hence getting a direct infusion into the TARP), GM

GM loading...

Quote  |  Chart  |  News  |  Profile

[GM  Loading...      ()   ]is also likely to be seeking the ability to sell auto loan assets directly into the TARP, which would help support the financing mechanism that has essentially collapsed.

Beyond this assistance, there are some very hard questions that need to be addressed. The big one is: does government "bailouts" of any of the Big Three auto makers really solve the problem?

What the Big Three have is:

1) cost structures that do not make sense, and

2) a collapse in volume: vehicle sales are at 25-year lows.

Most traders and analysts believe there is little if any equity value in GM.

What is likely to emerge here, with or without government assistance, is a much smaller GM. Instead of 25 percent of the market, perhaps 15 percent. That would still cost jobs (they have been shedding jobs for 8 years, by the way) but it might be their best shot at survival.

What about Chrysler? Remember 1979? Lee Iacocca? This would be the second bailout.

While a merger between Chrysler and GM may sound like a good idea politically, what would it accomplish:

1) there would still be enormous liquidity problems;

2) they would still need to cut product lines and cut jobs;

3) the government would likely throw huge amounts of money into the restructuring costs.

• Save The Auto Industry? Nope, Let Them "Die"
• GM: Cash Is More Than "King" For Survival

How many jobs would be saved by an additional $30 billion or larger investment by the government into a "bailout merger"? How many jobs would the government save to force a merger? Chrysler has probably 90 percent of its sales in North America; the vast majority of that is trucks that no one is buying in the quantities they are manufacturing.

There is no alternative to working down excess capacity.

_____________________________
New from CNBC.com:

- The Dow 30 at a Glance

_____________________________

Questions?  Comments? 

Tools:

PrintEmail

Previous PostBack to Main Page

• 

POPULAR TRADER TALK POSTS

• 

• Have Retailers Hit Their Limits? 

• 

• The Good And Bad of Credit Cards 

• 

• Wall Street Fears Dodd Bill 

COMMENTS

More Comments

 

« First | « Previous

Next » | Last »

Thank you for joining our discussion. Your comment has been posted.

ADD COMMENTS

Please Sign In or Register to participate.

In order to add a comment you must click here and accept our terms and conditions.

Edit Screen Name

Please sign-in/optin or register to be able to submit comments.

Remaining characters

CNBC welcomes your contribution. Please respect our community and the integrity of its participants. CNBC reserves the right to moderate and approve your comment.

PREVIEW COMMENT

Your comments have not been posted yet.
Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:

MORE TRADER TALK

» Trader Talk Home Page

Current DateTime: 11:24:20 01 Dec 2009
LinksList Documentid: 23279666
Expiration DateTime: 12/1/2009 11:27:26 AM

• • The Risk Trade Has Not Gone Away—Yet
  • Black Friday No Disaster, But Retail May Be Dead For A Bit
  • Traders Focus On The Homefront
  • Despite Dubai, U.S. Markets Calm
  • Stocks Lurking Near New Highs Again
  • Risk Trade Is Back On
  • This Week's Biggest Story: The Dollar
  • Corporate Issuance Continues at Torrid Pace
  • The Bernanke Dollar Bounce & Gross Says Forget About Rate Hike
  • Colgate Really Sparkles After Hours