Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
More Videos
#DIANAOLICK ON TWITTER
- Robo-Deal Is All About Lowering Mortgage Principal
- As Mortgage Refinancings Surge, Banks Struggle
- Forty States Sign On to Foreclosure ‘Robo’ Settlement
- Running Robo-Settlement Numbers
- Own vs. Rent Riles Government Housing Policy
- Obama's Mortgage Refi Plan to Go Through FHA
- Housing Demand Defies Fundamentals
- US Treasury Forcing Mortgage Principal Forgiveness
- Robo-Reality: Final Foreclosures Fall as Pipeline Swells
- New Financial Crimes Unit Could Throw Wrench in ‘Robo’ Settlement
MOST SHARED
- Criminal Probe Trail Going Cold at MF Global
- Global Markets Update: Markets Soften After Failure to Clinch Greek Deal
- Israel Likely to Bomb Iran This Year: Political Analyst
- Bank of America’s Worst-Case Scenario Gets More Real
- EU Agrees Rules for $700 Trillion Derivatives Market
- Stocks Seen Lower; Greek Debt Hurdles Remain
- CPAC 2012: Energized or Demoralized?
- Greek Aid Deal 'Much Better' Than Euro Exit: Summers
- Global Markets Update: European Markets Follow Asia Lower
- Greeks on Strike as the Second Bailout Is in Limbo
- Bank of America’s Worst-Case Scenario Gets More Real
- Tesla Unveils First SUV: Model X
- New York Fashion Week Hits the Runway as Colors Pop
- Mulling Buffett's Stock Advice? Get in With REITs: Fund Managers
- LinkedIn Earnings Bode Well for Hiring and Social Media
- Top Five Mistakes to Avoid in Online Dating
- Victor Cruz ‘Understands’ Gisele's Super Bowl Frustrations
- Tamminen: The United States of India
- Unusual Volume: Taleo Jumps After Oracle's $1.9 Billion Offer
- Bonus Bloodbath: Europe Banker Backlash Continues
- Stocks Looking Past Europe for a New Driver of the Rally
- SEC Reaches Settlement in Bear Stearns Fraud Case
- Israel Likely to Bomb Iran This Year: Political Analyst
- EU Agrees Rules for $700 Trillion Derivatives Market
- The World's Best Beers
- Rep. Bachus Faces Insider Trading Probe: Report
- In Europe, Stagnation as a Way of Life
- Citigroup Takes $50 Million Loss in Lending Rate Probe
RSS FEED
Realty Check
Text Size 
Reasons NOT To Modify Troubled Home Loans
 |
CNBC.com |
I've heard a lot of arguments against, but today I read the most compelling testimony from David Kittle, Chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association before the Senate Judiciary Committee:
First, no one should make filing for bankruptcy appear attractive. There are real and severe consequences for consumers who declare bankruptcy. Bankruptcy stays on a credit report for seven to ten years. It makes it very difficult to acquire future credit for a new home or car. It can stand in the way of getting insurance. It can make it harder to get a new job or even to rent a home or an apartment.
Two-thirds of those people who file for bankruptcy are unable to fulfill the terms of their repayments plans. Two thirds. In other words, two-thirds of those who file will still lose their home, and still have the bankruptcy on their record.
Second, changing the law will force lenders to impose tougher standards on people trying to get a mortgage. Cramdown legislation would add new risks to the calculation lenders make in setting prices. For the first time, lenders will have to pay more attention to markets with the most volatility and those with higher risks, such as rural areas, inner cities and new subdivisions, where history shows the greatest fluctuation of home values. This could even lead to a new era of redlining. Lenders would be forced to demand larger down payments and raise interest rates to balance the risk from judges who could change the mortgage contract and cause lenders or investors to suffer an economic loss.
Third, as you know, our financial markets are incredibly fragile right now. Cramdown legislation will only add more instability. The only option for many low-income borrowers today is to get an FHA-insured loan, where the government minimizes the risk to the lender of making a low-down payment loan. Cramdown legislation would make it harder for borrowers to get an FHA loan, because lenders would face the possibility that FHA insurance would not cover the loss from a principal reduction. The same is true for VA lending. In effect, Congress would end the only meaningful lending option currently available to most low-income borrowers - almost overnight.
I have to say I've never focussed on that last one regarding FHA loans. FHA's slice of the mortgage pie (sorry, Thanksgiving on the mind) has grown exponentially in the last year, and therefore so too has its importance as a driver of the housing recovery.
To put the FHA loans farther out of reach would, I fear, be even more detrimental than making bankruptcy more attractive. Also, given how risk-averse the current financial system is, adding to it with the unknown random judges making near-random decisions on loans, could throw yet another wrench into the mortgage-backed securities market, which, as we all know, is basically on life support as it is.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
